Morgan v. State
308 Ga. App. 69
Ga. Ct. App.2011Background
- Morgan was arrested for DUI and failure to yield on March 24, 2009;
- May 21, 2009 he pled guilty to reckless driving and failure to yield with a 90‑day suspended sentence and 21 months’ probation, to be served via Cobb County DUI Court;
- One week after sentencing, Driver Services notified Morgan he was a habitual violator based on two DUIs and a hit‑and‑run in other counties, requiring license surrender;
- July 14, 2009 a warrant issued for driving after habitual violator;
- State court found Morgan violated probation by driving on a suspended license and jailed him for 30 days;
- Morgan was indicted in superior court for operating a vehicle on July 14, 2009 after habitual violator notice, and moved to bar the indictment as double jeopardy; the superior court denied the motion and Morgan appealed to challenge whether probation revocation barred the indictment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does probation revocation bar subsequent indictment for habitual violator under double jeopardy? | Morgan argues probation revocation constitutes guilt for habitual violator, barring indictment. | State argues probation revocation is not a criminal proceeding and does not bar indictment. | No; probation revocation is not a criminal conviction and does not bar the indictment. |
Key Cases Cited
- Chandler v. State, 305 Ga. App. 526, 699 S.E.2d 840 (2010) (double jeopardy standard for plea in bar; cited by court)
- In the Interest of B.N.D., 185 Ga.App. 906, 366 S.E.2d 187 (1988) (general double jeopardy principles cited)
- Morris v. State, 166 Ga. App. 137, 303 S.E.2d 492 (1983) (probation revocation not criminal proceeding; prior authority)
- Dutton v. Willis, 223 Ga. 209, 154 S.E.2d 221 (1967) (probation revocation not a criminal proceeding; separate actions)
- Perry v. State, 213 Ga.App. 220, 444 S.E.2d 150 (1994) (supports view of non-criminal nature of probation revocation)
- Johnson v. State, 142 Ga.App. 124, 235 S.E.2d 550 (1977) (probation properly revoked on same evidence as jury acquittal)
