History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moreta v. Holder, Jr.
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14255
| 1st Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Moreta, a Dominican Republic native, was admitted as a conditional permanent resident based on a U.S. citizen marriage.
  • Her conditional status ended after divorce and a petition to remove conditions was denied.
  • During removal proceedings on Jan 7, 2010, Moreta sought to renew the conditions petition and apply for cancellation of removal, with a 60-day deadline set by the IJ.
  • The IJ ordered filing by March 8, 2010, and warned updates due by April 17, 2011, and possible abandonment for noncompliance.
  • Moreta filed the applications on Sept 15, 2010, over six months past the deadline, without timely updates or a motion to accept late filing.
  • The IJ denied relief on abandonment (and alternatively on the merits), the BIA affirmed abandonment, and Moreta petitioned for judicial review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Abandonment by missing deadline Moreta argues no abuse; late filing cannot be abandonment given eventual filing. IJ had authority to deem late applications waived for missing deadline without good cause. Abandonment by missed deadline upheld; discretion not abused.
BIA need not address alternate grounds BIA should consider all arguments, including alternative grounds. BIA may decline to address arguments if the result rests on another upheld ground. BIA did not abuse discretion by not addressing alternative grounds.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gomez-Medina v. Holder, 687 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2012) (IJ discretion in case-management and deadline rulings reviewed for abuse)
  • Caldero-Guzman v. Holder, 577 F.3d 345 (1st Cir. 2009) (noncitizen abandonment sanction not abuse absent arbitrary action)
  • Alsamhouri v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 117 (1st Cir. 2007) (timeliness and abandonment standards in immigration relief cases)
  • Ahlijah v. Ashcroft, 123 F. App'x 4 (1st Cir. 2005) (no due-process right to discretionary immigration relief; timely filing emphasized)
  • Uruci v. Holder, 558 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2009) (review of IJ decisions adopted by BIA)
  • Matter of R-R-, 20 I. & N. Dec. 547 (BIA 1992) (BIA practice of denying benefits for late-filed applications)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Moreta v. Holder, Jr.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Jul 15, 2013
Citation: 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14255
Docket Number: 12-1902
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.