History
  • No items yet
midpage
129 So. 3d 653
La. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Browns purchased 7047 Lake Willow Dr. in 1997; property later tax-sold to Mooring in 2004; tax deed issued 2004 and recorded 2005.
  • Browns sold property to NARA, L.L.C. in 2007, which then sold to Mr. James in 2008; Mooring filed a quiet-title action in 2010 seeking to terminate James’ interest.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment nullifying the 2004 tax sale and deed due to lack of proper pre-sale notice and advertisement.
  • Mooring sought to recover costs under La. R.S. 47:2291; James contended statute not retroactive and no reimbursement duty against a third-party purchaser.
  • Trial court allowed Mooring to submit proof of costs; James moved to contest; court ultimately awarded no reimbursement and declared nullity with immediate effect.
  • Mooring appeals challenging the denial of costs recovery and the immediate effect of the nullity ruling.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 47:2291 applies to determine costs in a pre-2009 tax sale nullity Mooring entitled to costs under 47:2291 Statute applies prospectively to post-2009 sales only 47:2291 not retroactive; inapplicable here
Whether Art. VII, § 25(C) requires reimbursement by James to Mooring as a third-party purchaser James must reimburse Mooring for expenditures James is not liable as third-party purchaser; remedies limited to tax debtor/record owner No reimbursement duty by James under the circumstances
Whether the judgment should take effect immediately or wait for payment of costs Nullity should be prospective until costs are paid Immediate effectiveness consistent with the nullity ruling Judgment and nullity to have immediate effect; no error in immediate cancellation
Whether Mooring’s status as third-party purchaser alters liability analysis under Brookewood and Lindner Brookewood expands liability to third-party purchaser Brookewood limited reimbursement to tax debtor/record owner; James not liable James not obligated to reimburse Mooring; Brookewood distinguished

Key Cases Cited

  • Brookewood Investments Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway, LLC, 108 So.3d 329 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2013) (limits remedy to tax debtor/record owner; caveat emptor applies to third-party purchasers)
  • Lindner v. City of New Orleans, 40 So. 736 (La. 1906) (tax purchaser bears risk; remedy against tax debtor/record owner)
  • Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 94 So.3d 750 (La. 2012) (former owner not time-barred; notice deficiencies affect reimbursement rights)
  • Mattern v. Parqutt, 123 So. 189 (La. App. Orl. 1929) (statutory expenditures; reimbursement timelines in prior framework)
  • Robinson v. Zor, Inc., 174 So.2d 154 (La. App. 4th Cir. 1965) (historical clawback of costs from tax sale)
  • Garry v. Zor, Inc., 181 So.2d 828 (La. App. 4th Cir. 1966) (related costs/reimbursement principles in tax sales)
  • Lindner v. City of New Orleans, 116 La. 372, 40 So. 736 (La. 1906) (early rule: purchaser bears risk; reimbursement only from tax debtor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. James
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 6, 2013
Citations: 129 So. 3d 653; 2013 WL 5946655; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 2316; 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0607; No. 2013-CA-0607
Docket Number: No. 2013-CA-0607
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. James, 129 So. 3d 653