History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Keller
2014 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 427
| Pa. Commw. Ct. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Grace B. Moore executed a will naming Megan Moore (Appellant) and Susan Gauntlett as co-executrices and directing sale of the Property after her death.
  • A 1993 codicil granted Appellant an option to purchase the Property at fair market value minus improvements Appellant made during Grace B. Moore’s lifetime.
  • Grace B. Moore died in 1999; no estate was opened, yet Appellant has lived at the Property since 1993 and paid taxes and made capital improvements.
  • In 2012 the Property was listed for sale for nonpayment of 2010 real estate taxes; the balance due for 2010 was about $287.55, with Appellant having paid $2,394.34 toward 2010 taxes.
  • The Bureau sent tax documents to an address for Appellant, received a check for $2,400.01, but the check was not cashed; the tax sale occurred on September 20, 2012 to Glen Keller for the upset price.
  • Appellant petitioned to set aside the sale; the trial court found she lacked standing and that notice complied with the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, and dismissed the petition.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Appellant has standing to object to the tax sale Appellant is an equitable owner and thus an aggrieved party with substantial, direct, immediate interest. Only an 'owner' or 'lien creditor' as defined by the Law may object. Appellant has standing as an equitable owner.
Whether the Bureau's failure to offer an installment agreement violated due process Appellant, paying ~88% of 2010 taxes, was entitled to the installment option and its absence violated due process. No clear contention in the opinion; Bureau's notice complied or issue not resolved here. The Bureau failed to offer the installment option; remand for setting aside the sale.

Key Cases Cited

  • Husak v. Fayette Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau, 61 A.3d 302 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2013) (standing based on aggrieved party with substantial, direct and immediate interest)
  • Maier v. Henning, 525 Pa. 160, 578 A.2d 1279 (1990) (devisee acquires legal title at death subject to personal representative powers)
  • Reilly v. Susquehanna Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau, 904 A.2d 49 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006) (due process for installment agreement when 25% paid)
  • York v. Roach, 163 Pa. Cmwlth. 58, 639 A.2d 1291 (1994) (installment agreement notice requirements under Law)
  • Darden v. Montgomery Cnty. Tax Claim Bureau, 157 Pa.Cmwlth. 357, 629 A.2d 321 (1993) (installment agreement notice requirements and due process)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Keller
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 5, 2014
Citation: 2014 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 427
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.