History
  • No items yet
midpage
Montana Trout Unlimited v. Beaverhead Water Co.
255 P.3d 179
Mont.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • MTU objected to Water Court’s temporary preliminary decree in Big Hole River Basin (Basin 41D).
  • Water Court granted summary judgment upholding MTU lacked standing to object under §85-2-233, MCA (per Bean Lake III framework).
  • MTU is a citizen conservation group with environmental/recreational interests in Big Hole River; no MTU water rights filed in adjudication.
  • Water Court concluded MTU’s interests were not coupled with an enforceable ownership in water/use, thus no standing to file claims or objections.
  • Court analyzed statutory standing provisions, noting §85-2-223 exclusive representation by DFWP for public recreational uses, but rejecting overbreadth as to MTU’s standing to object.
  • MTU challenges the Water Court’s interpretation and remands for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether DFWP sole representation of public interests is correct. MTU has concrete, ownable interests in water use; Bean Lake III interpretation overbroad. DFWP alone may represent public recreational uses in adjudications. No; statute does not bar MTU from objecting where good cause shown.
Whether MTU may obtain a hearing on objections without owning a water right. Good cause includes ownership in water/use; MTU has such interests. Hearing rights limited to those with water-right claims; MTU lacks ownership. MTU has standing to request hearings because good cause can be shown via ownership interest in water/use.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bean Lake III, 311 Mont. 327, 55 P.3d 396 (2002 MT 216) (public trust/public recreational interests in adjudication; framework for standing)
  • Bean Lake I, 234 Mont. 331, 766 P.2d 228 (1988) (recognized broad participation by public interest groups in Bean Lake proceedings)
  • Bean Lake II, 240 Mont. 39, 782 P.2d 898 (1989) (public interests and cost shifting in Bean Lake proceedings)
  • Adjudication of Rights in the Yellowstone River, 253 Mont. 167, 832 P.2d 1210 (1992) (emphasizes comprehensive participation to adjudicate Montana water rights)
  • MEIC v. DEQ, 1999 MT 248, 296 Mont. 207, 988 P.2d 1236 (1999) (standing of citizen environmental organizations to challenge agency decisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Montana Trout Unlimited v. Beaverhead Water Co.
Court Name: Montana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 23, 2011
Citation: 255 P.3d 179
Docket Number: DA 10-0382
Court Abbreviation: Mont.