History
  • No items yet
midpage
MOENNING v. Union Pacific R. Co.
966 N.E.2d 443
Ill. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Moenning, plaintiff, sued Union Pacific Railroad Co. for injuries from disembarking a train car off the platform.
  • Lerum represented Moenning in trial; lien rights arise under the Attorneys Lien Act (770 ILCS 5/1).
  • Lerum filed a petition to adjudicate and enforce his lien, attaching a contingency-fee agreement (1/3 of gross recovery, excluding any recovery during an appeal or retrial).
  • Lerum claimed 341.5 hours of services and $9,471.03 in expenses; notice of lien was served by certified mail to Union Pacific (addressed to an UP attorney) and accepted by someone signing as M. Bovenza.
  • Moenning contested perfection of the lien and subject-matter jurisdiction; trial court granted the lien petition in the amount of $51,137.69 plus interest; later, motions to reconsider were denied and appeals followed.
  • The appellate court ultimately affirmed the trial court’s orders granting the lien adjudication and denying the reconsideration.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the circuit court was divested of jurisdiction to adjudicate the lien. Moenning (Plaintiff) Lerum (Defendant) No; court retained jurisdiction as lien matter collateral to appeal.
Whether Lerum’s lien was properly perfected. Moenning Lerum Lien properly perfected; notice directed to an UP officer; petition timely adjudicated.
Whether December 2, 2009 order was final and appealable. Moenning Lerum Final order; timely appeal under Rule 303(a)(1).
Whether the petition to adjudicate the lien could be heard after Moenning filed an appeal of the underlying judgment. Moenning Lerum Permissible; lien proceedings did not affect the issues on appeal and were independent.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit, P.C. v. Rossiello, 392 Ill.App.3d 1059 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009) (attorney lien perfection and burden on showing services)
  • Philip Morris, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 198 Ill.2d 87 (Ill. 2001) (lien rights and distribution of proceeds to attorney)
  • Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Hartford Hospital, 321 Ill.App.3d 879 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001) (collateral matters may be heard while appeal pending)
  • Town of Libertyville v. Bank of Waukegan, 152 Ill.App.3d 1066 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987) (fees/costs collateral to condemnation judgment may be heard)
  • General Motors Corp. v. Department of Local Government, 242 Ill.2d 163 (Ill. 2011) (jurisdiction to award collateral relief after notice of appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: MOENNING v. Union Pacific R. Co.
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Feb 21, 2012
Citation: 966 N.E.2d 443
Docket Number: 1-10-1866
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.