History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moala v. State
2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 305
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Moala stopped for speeding in Indianapolis; odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes observed; Moala admitted consuming five or six drinks; he performed poorly on field sobriety tests and chemical test showed BAC .10; charges: OWD causing endangerment (A misdemeanor), operating with BAC .08–.15 (Class C), public intoxication (Class B); bench trial resulted in convictions and a complex merging/sentencing order; trial court ultimately merged Count II into Count I (OWD} ; Count III (Public Intoxication) sentenced separately; both sentences served concurrently; State moved to dismiss but final order kept both counts, leading to Moala’s appeal; Indiana Court of Appeals vacates the lesser conviction to cure double jeopardy]),
  • Moala appeals on double jeopardy grounds, arguing the evidence supports both OWD and public intoxication from the same incident; State concedes double jeopardy but seeks to dismiss the public intoxication count; appellate court agrees a double jeopardy violation occurred and must remedy

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether double jeopardy violated by convicting both OWD and public intoxication Moala argues same evidentiary facts support two offenses State concedes violation but seeks to vacate public intoxication Double jeopardy exists; one conviction must be vacated
Appropriate remedy for the double jeopardy violation Vacate the lesser-punished conviction (OWD) to cure violation State suggests vacating public intoxication or exercising prosecutorial discretion Vacate the OWD conviction; leave public intoxication intact

Key Cases Cited

  • Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32 (Ind. 1999) (actual-evidence test for same-offense double jeopardy; remedy via vacatur of one conviction)
  • Smith v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1040 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (vacate higher or lesser offense depending on penal consequences under Richardson)
  • Jenkins v. State, 726 N.E.2d 268 (Ind. 2000) (vacate the one with less severe penal consequences)
  • Newgent v. State, 897 N.E.2d 520 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (double jeopardy; vacate less serious conviction)
  • Williams v. State, 892 N.E.2d 666 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (double jeopardy; vacate respective conviction)
  • Owens v. State, 742 N.E.2d 538 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001) (double jeopardy; vacate lesser conviction)
  • Noble v. State, 734 N.E.2d 1119 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (equal-severity double jeopardy cases; vacate second count)
  • Schrefler v. State, 660 N.E.2d 585 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996) (license suspension not punitive for double jeopardy purposes)
  • Hunter v. State, 802 N.E.2d 480 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (suspension of driving privileges is remedial; not punitive for DJ)
  • H.M. v. State, 892 N.E.2d 679 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (juvenile delinquency findings and later penalties discussed for DJ context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Moala v. State
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 27, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 305
Docket Number: 49A02-1109-CR-870
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.