Moala v. State
2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 305
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2012Background
- Moala stopped for speeding in Indianapolis; odor of alcohol and bloodshot eyes observed; Moala admitted consuming five or six drinks; he performed poorly on field sobriety tests and chemical test showed BAC .10; charges: OWD causing endangerment (A misdemeanor), operating with BAC .08–.15 (Class C), public intoxication (Class B); bench trial resulted in convictions and a complex merging/sentencing order; trial court ultimately merged Count II into Count I (OWD} ; Count III (Public Intoxication) sentenced separately; both sentences served concurrently; State moved to dismiss but final order kept both counts, leading to Moala’s appeal; Indiana Court of Appeals vacates the lesser conviction to cure double jeopardy]),
- Moala appeals on double jeopardy grounds, arguing the evidence supports both OWD and public intoxication from the same incident; State concedes double jeopardy but seeks to dismiss the public intoxication count; appellate court agrees a double jeopardy violation occurred and must remedy
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether double jeopardy violated by convicting both OWD and public intoxication | Moala argues same evidentiary facts support two offenses | State concedes violation but seeks to vacate public intoxication | Double jeopardy exists; one conviction must be vacated |
| Appropriate remedy for the double jeopardy violation | Vacate the lesser-punished conviction (OWD) to cure violation | State suggests vacating public intoxication or exercising prosecutorial discretion | Vacate the OWD conviction; leave public intoxication intact |
Key Cases Cited
- Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32 (Ind. 1999) (actual-evidence test for same-offense double jeopardy; remedy via vacatur of one conviction)
- Smith v. State, 881 N.E.2d 1040 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (vacate higher or lesser offense depending on penal consequences under Richardson)
- Jenkins v. State, 726 N.E.2d 268 (Ind. 2000) (vacate the one with less severe penal consequences)
- Newgent v. State, 897 N.E.2d 520 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (double jeopardy; vacate less serious conviction)
- Williams v. State, 892 N.E.2d 666 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (double jeopardy; vacate respective conviction)
- Owens v. State, 742 N.E.2d 538 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001) (double jeopardy; vacate lesser conviction)
- Noble v. State, 734 N.E.2d 1119 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (equal-severity double jeopardy cases; vacate second count)
- Schrefler v. State, 660 N.E.2d 585 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996) (license suspension not punitive for double jeopardy purposes)
- Hunter v. State, 802 N.E.2d 480 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (suspension of driving privileges is remedial; not punitive for DJ)
- H.M. v. State, 892 N.E.2d 679 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (juvenile delinquency findings and later penalties discussed for DJ context)
