Mississippi State Federation of Colored Women's Club Housing for the Elderly in Clinton, Inc. v. in the Interest of L.R.
62 So. 3d 351
Miss.2010Background
- Eleven-year-old L.R. was raped multiple times by Tony Kelly at Federation Tower; she became pregnant and gave birth to a child.
- Parents sued Federation and Southern Management for premises liability and related damages; jury awarded $200,000 total with 40% fault to Federation and 60% to L.R.'s father.
- Trial court added $800,000 (additur) but publishers did not accept; judgment was challenged on appeal.
- L.R. claimed evidentiary errors (consent, prior molestation, damages) and improper fault allocation to her father; Federation challenged additur and other rulings.
- Mississippi Supreme Court addressed motions in limine, evidentiary issues, fault allocation, and additur, ultimately reversing and remanding for entry of $200,000 against Federation.
- Majority remanded to enter final judgment consistent with jury verdict; additur was found improper and new-trial relief denied on other grounds.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consent evidence admissibility | LR contends consent evidence is improper due to statute and prejudicial. | Federation argues consent has limited relevance; civil trial rules govern admissibility. | Consent evidence properly admitted for causation/damages; not reversible error. |
| Economic cost of raising a child | Damages may include cost of rearing the child born from the rape. | Costs of rearing a child should not be recoverable; benefits offsetting applies. | Evidence of rearing costs excluded; majority rule denies child-rearing damages. |
| Hearsay objections to expert Bishop | Bishop could relay L.R.'s statements for credibility. | Hearsay objections should limit such testimony. | No reversible error; testimony limited but not prejudicial. |
| Directed verdict on mother's emotional distress | Mother's emotional distress claims warranted beyond simple worry. | Evidence insufficient under Adams v. U.S. Homecrafters. | Directed verdict upheld; no error. |
| Apportionment of fault to the father | Fault cannot be allocated to LR's father given evidence. | Allocation to a nonparty or parent may be permissible based on facts. | Trial court reversal of fault allocation to LR's father affirmed; fault allocation to parent improper. |
Key Cases Cited
- Adams v. U.S. Homecrafters, Inc., 744 So.2d 736 (Miss. 1999) (emotional-distress damages and admissibility standards)
- Summers v. St. Andrew's Episcopal Sch., Inc., 759 So.2d 1203 (Miss. 2000) (by-stander and emotional-distress framework; Dillon factors)
- Dorrill v. State Highway Comm'n of Miss., 525 So.2d 1333 (Miss. 1988) (requirements for additur/remittitur; findings needed)
- Glover v. Jackson State Univ., 968 So.2d 1267 (Miss. 2007) (imputation of knowledge to employer in causation)
- Stavroula S. v. Guerriera, 193 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993) (consent in civil battery cases; admissibility varies by tort)
- Bjerke v. Johnson, 727 N.W.2d 183 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007) (majority view excluding minor-consent in civil statutory rape cases)
