History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 IL App (1st) 101316
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Milwaukee Insurance provided Larsen with CGL and umbrella coverage.
  • Weather-Tite hired Larsen to apply window sealant for Prairie District Homes (PDH).
  • PDH Association alleged defective construction causing water intrusion and damages in its third amended complaint.
  • Weather-Tite pleaded third-party claims against Larsen seeking contribution for negligence and breach of contract for failure to name Weather-Tite as an additional insured.
  • Milwaukee Insurance denied defense tenders; trial court granted Milwaukee summary judgment against Weather-Tite and Larsen’s cross-motion for summary judgment against Milwaukee; appellate court affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the underlying pleadings allege property damage within policy Milwaukee Insurance: pleadings lack property damage Larsen: pleadings impute damages to property from defective work Yes, pleadings allege property damage within policy
Does the pleadings show an occurrence causing property damage Milwaukee Insurance: no accident/occurrence Larsen: occurrence shown by damage from negligent workmanship Yes, occurrence alleged through significant water leakage from faulty workmanship
Is there a duty to defend Larsen given the pleadings Milwaukee Insurance: no coverage duties Larsen: possible coverage under policy terms Milwaukee has a duty to defend Larsen

Key Cases Cited

  • Travelers Ins. Co. v. Eljer Manufacturing, Inc., 197 Ill.2d 278 (Ill. 2001) (definition of property damage and economic loss under CGL policies)
  • Walsh Construction Co. v. Walsh,, 392 Ill.App.3d 312 (Ill. App. 2009) (duty to defend when allegations could fall within policy coverage)
  • Pekin Insurance Co. v. Richard Marker Associates, Inc., 289 Ill.App.3d 819 (Ill. App. 1997) (duty to defend where some allegations relate to third-party damages from insured's work)
  • CMK Development Corp. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co., 395 Ill.App.3d 830 (Ill. App. 2009) (policy interpretation and broad duty to defend when pleading could fall within coverage)
  • Stoneridge Development Co. v. Essex Insurance Co., 382 Ill.App.3d 731 (Ill. App. 2008) (coverage for damage to property other than the insured project under defective workmanship)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co. v. JP LARSEN
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Aug 15, 2011
Citations: 2011 IL App (1st) 101316; 956 N.E.2d 524; 353 Ill. Dec. 662; 1-10-1316
Docket Number: 1-10-1316
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co. v. JP LARSEN, 2011 IL App (1st) 101316