History
  • No items yet
midpage
25 A.3d 768
Del.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Miller was arrested and indicted by a Delaware Superior Court Grand Jury for drug and weapons offenses; convicted of Possession with Intent to Deliver Heroin and Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony; sentenced to 10 years Level V, 8 months Level IV halfway house, and 2 years Level III probation.
  • Superior Court denied Miller's motion to suppress; conviction followed a stipulated trial.
  • Miller challenges the warrantless seizure as unsupported by probable cause or reasonable articulable suspicion due to reliance on an unproven, unreliable informant with limited corroboration.
  • Facts show an informant with limited credibility provided detailed predictions about a drug delivery; police surveilled the area, corroborated the vehicle and timing, and Miller fled when approached; heroin and a handgun were observed in the vehicle.
  • The trial court and Delaware Supreme Court held the seizure reasonable under the totality of circumstances, relying on corroborated predictive information from the informant.
  • Standard of review recognizes suppression rulings as abuse of discretion, with de novo review for legal conclusions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the seizure supported by reasonable articulable suspicion based on the informant tip and corroboration? Miller argues the informant was unreliable and not sufficiently corroborated. State contends the tip, with specific predictions and corroboration, justified the stop. Yes; the informant’s specific predictions and police corroboration established reasonable suspicion.

Key Cases Cited

  • Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (U.S. 1990) (informant tips with predictive information can support reasonable suspicion when corroborated)
  • Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (U.S. 2000) (anonymous tips lacking predictive information fail to establish reasonable suspicion)
  • Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1959) (probable cause; not applicable here, but cited for informant reliability principles)
  • Tatman v. State, 494 A.2d 1249 (Del. 1985) (Delaware precedent on probable cause and warrantless searches)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1983) (totality of the circumstances; informant reliability and corroboration considerations)
  • Brown v. State, 897 A.2d 748 (Del. 2006) (informant reliability and basis of knowledge relevance in evaluating tips)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Aug 11, 2011
Citations: 25 A.3d 768; 2011 WL 3524441; 2011 Del. LEXIS 413; 610, 2010
Docket Number: 610, 2010
Court Abbreviation: Del.
Log In
    Miller v. State, 25 A.3d 768