History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller v. Miller
942 N.E.2d 438
Ohio Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Trumbull Industries is owned by two cousin groups: Murray and Sam H. as one set, and Sam M. and Ken Miller as the other.
  • Murray and Sam H., as shareholders/directors/officers, filed suit Feb. 24, 2003 against Sam M. and Umbs seeking injunctive relief and damages.
  • Sam M. is a Trumbull employee and was involved in a business opportunity called the 'Brand Company'—private-brand plumbing sourced from various suppliers.
  • Umbs, former Briggs Plumbing president, negotiated contracts with Jacuzzi, including a more favorable private-label arrangement that allegedly benefited Umbs and Sam M.
  • Sam M.’s involvement with Umbs and the Brand Company was allegedly not disclosed to all shareholders until Dec. 4, 2002.
  • The trial court later held Trumbull in contempt for failing to reimburse Sam M.’s attorney fees incurred during the litigation; the May 29, 2009 contempt order is the subject of this appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly ordered advancement of attorney fees Miller argues Sam M.’s conduct triggered advancement under RC 1701.13(E)(5)(a). Trumbull contends RC 1701.13(E)(5)(a) does not apply because Sam M. was not sued for acts on Trumbull’s behalf. RC 1701.13(E)(5)(a) does not apply; fees cannot be advanced against Trumbull.
Whether the director's indemnification/advancement was barred by the Articles of Incorporation Articles do not expressly preclude advancement; corporate duty to advance exists under statute. Articles lack explicit advancement provision; advancement was not mandated by the articles. Articles do not preclude advancement; statutory advancement applies only when applicable.

Key Cases Cited

  • Stepak v. Schey, 51 Ohio St.3d 8 (1990) (describes fiduciary duties and business judgment in director actions)
  • Gries Sports Ents., Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., Inc., 26 Ohio St.3d 15 (1986) (business-judgment rule protection for directors)
  • MD Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Myers, 173 Ohio App.3d 247 (2007-Ohio-3521) (Ohio appellate interpretation of indemnification under RC 1701.13)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Miller v. Miller
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 19, 2010
Citation: 942 N.E.2d 438
Docket Number: No. 2009-T-0061
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.