Miller v. Hempfling
2017 Ohio 8276
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Robert M. Miller and Nancy Lallier (successor co-executors and heirs) sued Ralph D. Hempfling (executor/heir of the other decedent) asserting fraudulent transfers, unjust enrichment, conversion, and concealment/embezzlement during estate administration.
- Bench trial occurred January 2015. The court's January 23, 2015 entry awarded Miller/Lallier on unjust enrichment for $9,924.07, ruled for Hempfling on other claims and on his counterclaim, but contemplated further action to finalize remedies (possession, possible $10,000 judgment plus penalties and fees if possession refused).
- Hempfling sought clarification after discovering additional property; the court issued a February 5, 2015 entry directing the parties to prepare a full inventory and set a March evidentiary hearing if disputes remained.
- Parties later submitted an agreed inventory; the court vacated the March hearing and accepted the inventory by journal entry on March 20, 2015, effectively resolving outstanding issues.
- Miller and Lallier filed a notice of appeal on August 16, 2017, seeking review of the January and February 2015 entries. Appellee argued the January entry was final and the appeal untimely.
- The Fourth District concluded the Jan. and Feb. entries were interlocutory but merged into the March 20, 2015 final judgment; the appeal—filed more than 30 days after that final entry—was dismissed as untimely.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Jan. 23 and Feb. 5, 2015 entries were final, appealable orders | Miller: appeal is timely (though dated >30 days) and the entries are not final; asked dismissal and remand to obtain a final order | Hempfling: Jan. 23 order was final; appeal is untimely | Court: Jan. and Feb. entries were interlocutory and merged into the March 20, 2015 final judgment |
| Whether the appeal was timely under App.R. 4 | Miller: contends appeal timely/premature (filed Aug. 16, 2017) | Hempfling: appeal untimely because final order issued Jan. 23, 2015 | Court: final, appealable judgment date was March 20, 2015; appeal filed >30 days later—dismissed for lack of jurisdiction |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Anderson, 6 N.E.3d 23 (Ohio 2014) (appellate jurisdiction exists only for final orders)
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ., 541 N.E.2d 64 (Ohio 1989) (order final only if it meets R.C. 2505.02 and Civ.R. 54(B) if applicable)
- Miller v. First Internatl. Fid. & Trust Bldg., Ltd., 866 N.E.2d 1059 (Ohio 2007) (final order must dispose of whole merits or a separate, distinct branch)
- Noble v. Colwell, 540 N.E.2d 1381 (Ohio 1989) (liability finding is not final if relief remains unresolved)
- State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 684 N.E.2d 72 (Ohio 1997) (orders contemplating further court action are not final)
- State v. Threatt, 843 N.E.2d 164 (Ohio 2006) (a judgment that leaves issues unresolved and contemplates further action is not final)
