Miller v. Enders
425 S.W.3d 723
Ark.2013Background
- Air Evac EMS helicopter crash in Benton County, Arkansas, Feb. 21, 2005; Miller (flight nurse), Bratt (EMT), Enders (pilot) were EMS employees.
- Miller and Bratt allege Enders’s negligent helicopter operation caused their injuries during emergency transport; injuries occurred in the scope of employment.
- Initial state case dismissed; Miller and Bratt filed a new action in 2009 alleging Enders’s negligence proximately caused damages.
- Enders asserted immunity under Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-105; Miller and Bratt argued current law allows tort claims against a co-employee and overruled immunity doctrine.
- Administrative history: circuit court granted dismissal; appeals led to Commission findings that Enders was a co-employee fulfilling a nondelegable safety duty and thus immune; Court of Appeals affirmed; Arkansas Supreme Court granted review.
- Court held Enders, a co-employee performing employer’s nondelegable duty to provide a safe workplace, is immune under § 11-9-105; prior precedents binding; constitutional challenge overruled.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Enders is a third party for tort liability purposes | Miller argues Enders is a third party under §§ 11-9-410 and 11-9-105. | Enders contends he is a co-employee fulfilling the employer’s duty and is immune. | Enders is not a third party; immune as co-employee. |
| Whether extending immunity to a co-employee is proper | Immunity should not extend to co-employees; Brown and earlier precedents should be overruled. | Precedent correctly extends immunity to co-employees fulfilling the employer’s duty to provide a safe workplace. | Immunity extended to co-employees is proper; affirmed. |
| Whether extending immunity to a negligent co-employee contravenes Art. 5, § 32 | Extension unlawfully limits recovery; constitution prohibits extending immunity beyond the employer. | Statutory and constitutional framework permit such immunity; precedent consistent with Article 5, § 32. | No constitutional violation; statute and Article 5, § 32 permit co-employee immunity. |
Key Cases Cited
- Brown v. Finney, 326 Ark. 691 (1996) (co-employees acting to provide safe workplace receive immunity)
- Barnes v. Wilkiewicz, 301 Ark. 175 (1990) (expanded workplace to include non-static locations)
- King v. Cardin, 229 Ark. 929 (1959) (negligent co-employee can be third party under workers’ comp)
- Neal v. Oliver, 246 Ark. 377 (1969) (employer cannot delegate duty to provide safe workplace)
- Simmons First National Bank v. Thompson, 285 Ark. 275 (1985) (supervisory employee immunity for unsafe workplace)
- Allen v. Kizer, 294 Ark. 1 (1987) (extended immunity to nonsupervisory employees for unsafe workplace)
- Stapleton v. M.D. Limbaugh Construction Co., 333 Ark. 381 (1998) (Stapleton limited immunity application to prime contractor context)
- Baldwin Co. v. Maner, 224 Ark. 348 (1954) (constitutional interpretation of Article 5, § 32 prior to amendment)
- Pifer v. Single Source Transp., 347 Ark. 851 (2002) (recognizes deference to appellate construction of workers’ comp statutes)
- McCutchen v. City of Fort Smith, 2012 Ark. 452 (2012) (courts uphold prior interpretations unless manifest injustice requires overrule)
