History
  • No items yet
midpage
Milford v. State
291 Ga. 347
| Ga. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Milford was convicted of felony murder and armed robbery for a shooting death.
  • Victim died months after the shooting from respiratory complications related to the neck wound.
  • Witnesses placed Milford at the scene; accomplice testified Milford robbed the victim and fired after seeing him on a phone.
  • A responding officer obtained statements from the now-deceased victim during an ongoing emergency.
  • Milford challenged the admissibility of the victim’s statements under confrontation and hearsay rules; trial court denied the motion for new trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Confrontation exception for victim statements Milford argues officer testimony violated confrontation rights State contends statements were non-testimonial Statements non-testimonial; admissible under res gestae/ongoing emergency.
Sufficiency of the evidence Milford contends evidence insufficient for guilt Jury could reasonably find guilt beyond reasonable doubt Sufficient evidence supported Guilty verdict.
Immunity/leniency instruction requested Immunity/leniency should be charged Charge covered same principles No error; given charge encompassed requested principles.
Mere presence at scene and related concepts Jury should be instructed that mere presence isn’t enough Instructions already covered these principles No error; charge aligned with requested concept.
Voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offense Should have been instructed on voluntary manslaughter Insufficient provocation evidence No error; evidence did not show sudden, irresistible passion.
Causation in homicide context Should have an explicit causation instruction Jury properly charged on causation No error; causation instruction was correct.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979) (sufficiency standard for evidence to sustain conviction)
  • Philpot v. State, 309 Ga. App. 196 (Ga. App. 2011) (non-testimonial statements during ongoing emergency admissible)
  • Michigan v. Bryant, 131 S. Ct. 131 (2011) (U.S. 2011) (statements during investigation may be non-testimonial when emergency controls)
  • Thomas v. State, 284 Ga. 540 (Ga. 2008) (non-testimonial rule application; res gestae implications)
  • Green v. State, 266 Ga. 758 (Ga. 1996) (causation instructions proper)
  • Nichols v. State, 275 Ga. 246 (Ga. 2002) (voluntary manslaughter instruction standard)
  • Tumlin v. State, 274 Ga. 309 (Ga. 2001) (charge on immunity/leniency mirrors given standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Milford v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 2, 2012
Citation: 291 Ga. 347
Docket Number: S12A1283
Court Abbreviation: Ga.