midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
96 So. 3d 638
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Milburn appeals the trial court's grant of exceptions of prematurity and no cause of action filed by Emanuele.
  • Milburn alleged a contract with Emanuele as contractor for renovations by SDRC, with payments made but work not performed properly.
  • Milburn claimed Emanuele did not remedy contract work issues after notification.
  • Emanuele asserted prematurity and no right of action defenses; later argued the contract was between Milburn and SDRC.
  • The trial court granted prematurity, denied no right of action, and granted no cause of action; appeal followed.
  • On review, the appellate court vacated prematurity, reversed no cause of action, and remanded for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Validity and enforceability of mediation clause Milburn contends mediation clause is valid. Emanuele maintains mediation clause is valid and enforceable. Contract evidence not admitted; prematurity vacated.
Whether Milburn states a no-cause-of-action claim for breach by Emanuele Milburn's petition alleges contract with Emanuele personally. Contract was with SDRC; Milburn lacks remedy against Emanuele. No cause of action improperly granted; reversed.
Whether Emanuele is a proper party Emanuele may be the proper party given contract terms. Parties contest whether Emanuele is properly joined. Remand for proper determination; issue not finally resolved.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re: Helm, 84 So.3d 601 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2011) (evidence must be properly offered to be considered)
  • Denoux v. Vessel Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 983 So.2d 84 (La.5/21/08) (officially offered evidence required)
  • Porter v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp., 72 So.3d 946 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2011) (vacate when evidence not properly presented)
  • 831 Bartholomew Investments-A, L.L.C. v. Margulis, 20 So.3d 532 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2009) (de novo review of no-cause-of-action exceptions)
  • Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So.2d 1234 (La.1993) (four corners rule for no-cause-of-action)
  • Jefferson Door Co. v. Cragmar Const, L.L.C., 81 So.3d 1001 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2012) (manifest error standard for dilatory exceptions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Milburn v. Emanuele
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 13, 2012
Citations: 96 So. 3d 638; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 858; 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 0235; 2012 WL 2149550; No. 2012-CA-0235
Docket Number: No. 2012-CA-0235
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In