History
  • No items yet
midpage
795 F.3d 864
8th Cir.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Falco was a Farmers insurance agent from 1990 until Farmers terminated his Agent Appointment Agreement in June 2011. The Agreement provided for a post-termination Contract Value calculated by formula.
  • In 2006 Falco obtained a business loan from Farmers Insurance Group Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) and, under the Loan Agreement, assigned his Agent Agreement receivables (including Contract Value) to the Credit Union as security and granted the Credit Union a power of attorney to demand payments and tender his resignation on default.
  • Falco defaulted on the loan in early 2010 and filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in March 2010; his personal liability on the loan was discharged in February 2011. The Credit Union nonetheless exercised its power of attorney to terminate the Agent Agreement, and Farmers calculated and paid out the Contract Value—paying the Credit Union first and the remainder to Falco.
  • Falco sued Farmers, Crossetti (an agency manager), and the Credit Union in state court asserting bankruptcy-law violations (including §524), tortious interference, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and civil conspiracy. The case was removed to federal court and Falco amended the complaint once.
  • The district court granted summary judgment to Farmers and Crossetti on all claims and later granted summary judgment to the Credit Union on the remaining claims; on appeal Falco chiefly argued the Credit Union was a fiduciary (via the power of attorney) and breached duties, rendering its actions and the Loan Agreement unenforceable.
  • The Eighth Circuit affirmed, declining to consider Falco’s breach-of-fiduciary-duty and public-policy arguments because they were not pleaded in the operative complaint or litigated below.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Credit Union’s lien/rights to collect Contract Value were extinguished by Falco’s bankruptcy discharge Falco: discharge eliminated enforcement of the loan and secured rights; Credit Union could not use POA to terminate the Agency Credit Union/Farmers: lien survived bankruptcy discharge; security interest and POA enforcement were valid Held: Lien and secured interest survived discharge; summary judgment for defendants upheld
Whether Credit Union tortiously interfered with the Agent Agreement by tendering resignation Falco: Credit Union improperly terminated the Agency for its own benefit Defendants: Credit Union had contractual right to terminate under the Loan Agreement; Farmers/Crossetti were parties to the Agency Agreement so no improper interference Held: No tortious interference; summary judgment for defendants
Whether Farmers breached the Agent Agreement in terminating it Falco: termination breached contract rights to Contract Value Farmers: termination was by valid resignation/consent under contract and secured assignment; no breach Held: No breach of contract; summary judgment for Farmers
Whether civil conspiracy claim survives absent an underlying wrongful act Falco: defendants conspired in wrongful termination/payment scheme Defendants: no underlying wrongful or intentional tort established Held: Civil conspiracy fails for lack of underlying wrongful act; summary judgment for defendants

Key Cases Cited

  • Brooks v. Roy, 776 F.3d 957 (8th Cir.) (standard for summary judgment review)
  • Thomas v. Corwin, 483 F.3d 516 (8th Cir.) (mere allegations insufficient to defeat summary judgment)
  • Campbell v. Davol, Inc., 620 F.3d 887 (8th Cir.) (issues not raised below generally not considered on appeal)
  • Bearden v. Lemon, 475 F.3d 926 (8th Cir.) (appellate courts normally decline to consider issues district court did not rule upon)
  • Jasperson v. Purolator Courier Corp., 765 F.2d 736 (8th Cir.) (issues not raised, briefed, or argued receive no appellate consideration)
  • Northern States Power Co. v. Fed. Transit Admin., 358 F.3d 1050 (8th Cir.) (parties may not manufacture new claims late in litigation to avoid summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Falco v. Farmers Insurance Group
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 3, 2015
Citations: 795 F.3d 864; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13469; 2015 WL 4604817; 14-2733
Docket Number: 14-2733
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    Michael Falco v. Farmers Insurance Group, 795 F.3d 864