History
  • No items yet
midpage
Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Fraser
1:23-cv-09358
E.D.N.Y
May 6, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff, Star Chrysler, sued former employee Lionel Fraser in New York state court for unauthorized after-hours vehicle repairs on dealership premises for personal gain.
  • The claims alleged by Star Chrysler were various state-law claims, including fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment, breach of loyalty, and the faithless servant doctrine.
  • Defendant Fraser removed the case to federal court, arguing federal jurisdiction based on the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).
  • Upon further review, Fraser moved to withdraw his notice of removal, acknowledging that the claims did not arise under federal law.
  • Both parties ultimately agreed that the federal court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, and the case should be remanded to state court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Federal Question Jurisdiction Claims are purely state-law Initially argued claims arise under LMRA/FAA No federal jurisdiction; claims purely state-law
LMRA Section 301 Preemption Claims not based on labor contract Initially argued preemption under LMRA No preemption; claims unrelated to labor contract
FAA as a Basis for Jurisdiction FAA does not confer federal jurisdiction Initially cited FAA due to arbitration clause FAA provides no independent federal-question jurisdiction
Remand to State Court Agreed remand proper Agreed remand proper Remand to New York Supreme Court, Queens County

Key Cases Cited

  • Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh, 547 U.S. 677 (scope of federal question jurisdiction for removal)
  • Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (removal of preempted state-law claims under LMRA)
  • Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202 (LMRA Section 301 preempts state claims inextricably tied to labor contracts)
  • Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246 (state-law claims must depend on collective bargaining agreement to be preempted by LMRA)
  • Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1 (FAA does not independently confer federal question jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Metro Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Fraser
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: May 6, 2024
Docket Number: 1:23-cv-09358
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y