History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merino v. Salem Hunting Club
2012 Ohio 4553
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Merino owns property adjacent to the Club and filed suit in 2003 for trespass, nuisance, qualified nuisance, and negligence; he voluntarily dismissed in 2004 and refiled in 2005.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment to the Club on all claims in 2007; Merino appealed, and this court remanded for trial on disputed issues of qualified nuisance and negligence.
  • On remand (2010 bench trial), Merino presented multiple witnesses and exhibits; the Club moved for a directed verdict which the court granted, dismissing the complaint with prejudice.
  • In 2010 the Club moved under R.C. 2323.51 for attorney fees and expert fees, alleging frivolous conduct by Merino; Merino disputed timeliness and the merits of the frivolous-conduct claim.
  • The trial court awarded attorney fees (not expert fees) totaling $8,381.25 and denied expert fees, finding no evidence of negligence.
  • On appeal, this court held the fee-timing issue/relations back to the original filing were governed by Soler and Olivito; the first assignment of error was overruled, but the second assignment of error was sustained, leading to reversal of the trial court’s attorney-fees award.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of frivolous-conduct fee motion Merino argues Club failed to timely file under R.C. 2323.51(B)(1). Club contends filing within 30 days after final judgment in the refiled case is timely and relates back to the original filing. Timely; motion relates back to original filing; final judgment date governs filing window.
Whether Merino's conduct was frivolous given reliance on expert and remand Merino relied on expert testimony and our remand to proceed; his claims were not frivolous. Merino’s conduct and the trial outcome show frivolous conduct under R.C. 2323.51(A)(2)(a)(iii). Merino’s conduct was not frivolous; fees for frivolous conduct improper; assignment sustained.

Key Cases Cited

  • Soler v. Evans, St. Clair & Kelsey, 94 Ohio St.3d 432 (Ohio 2002) (defines 'final judgment' for R.C. 2323.51 timing)
  • Merino v. Salem Hunting Club, 2008-Ohio-6366 (7th Dist. No. 07 CO 16 (Ohio)) (Merino I: genuine issues of material fact on qualified nuisance and negligence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Merino v. Salem Hunting Club
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 4553
Docket Number: 11 CO 2
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.