History
  • No items yet
midpage
556 F. App'x 52
2d Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Memoglu, a native and citizen of Turkey, seeks review of a BIA decision affirming an IJ's denial of asylum.
  • The IJ decision was issued December 23, 2010; the BIA affirmed on December 11, 2012.
  • This court reviews the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination under established standards.
  • Memoglu contends persecution based on membership in a particular social group of male family members.
  • The government argues the claimed group is not cognizable and that any harm stems from a personal blood feud, not a protected ground.
  • The court ultimately denies relief, finding Memoglu failed to show persecution on account of a protected ground.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Memoglu's claimed group is cognizable and targeted on account of membership Memoglu argues the group of male family members is cognizable. Memoglu’s group lacks social visibility and is not a protected-ground targeted group. Group not cognizable; fear not tied to protected ground.

Key Cases Cited

  • Melgar de Torres v. Reno, 191 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 1999) (personal disputes do not establish protected-ground persecution)
  • Ucelo-Gomez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2007) (cognizable group requires social visibility and particularity)
  • Li v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2008) (standard of review for agency determinations)
  • Weng v. Holder, 562 F.3d 510 (2d Cir. 2009) (regular review framework for asylum determinations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Memoglu v. Holder
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Mar 3, 2014
Citations: 556 F. App'x 52; No. 13-30
Docket Number: No. 13-30
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In
    Memoglu v. Holder, 556 F. App'x 52