History
  • No items yet
midpage
Melanie Webster v. Walgreen Co.
966 N.E.2d 689
Ind. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Webster sued Walgreen Co. for a slip-and-fall at its Mooresville store on December 17, 2008.
  • On December 13, 2010, Webster's attorney mailed the complaint via certified mail weighing six ounces, with postage determined to be $6.83.
  • The postal service reweighed the envelope, found $.17 postage due, and the clerk refused to pay; the envelope was returned to the attorney.
  • Carter reweighed the envelope, added stamps for eight ounces, and resent it on December 21, 2010; the clerk stamped the complaint as filed on December 22, 2010.
  • By December 22, 2010, the two-year statute of limitations had run, and the complaint was untimely under that date.
  • Webster sought to amend the filing date to December 13, 2010; the trial court denied the motion and later Walgreen obtained judgment on the pleadings on September 6, 2011; Webster appeals the denial of the amendment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether mailing with insufficient postage constitutes filing under Trial Rule 5 Webster; filing occurred when first mailed Mailing incomplete without adequate postage Mailing requires adequate postage; filing not complete until proper postage and second mailing

Key Cases Cited

  • Comer v. Gohil, 664 N.E.2d 389 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996) (adequate postage required for effective mailing under statute; insufficient postage means not filed)
  • Boostrom v. Bach, 622 N.E.2d 175 (Ind. 1993) (filing not complete if filing fee is not paid; statutory policy to avoid stale claims prevails)
  • Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. v. Cronin, 903 N.E.2d 109 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (interpretation of Trial Rules reviewed de novo)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Melanie Webster v. Walgreen Co.
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 4, 2012
Citation: 966 N.E.2d 689
Docket Number: 55A01-1110-CT-442
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.