Mehrdad Moayedi v. Interstate 35/chisam Road, L.P. and Malachi Development Corporation
438 S.W.3d 1
| Tex. | 2014Background
- Villages of Sanger borrowed $696,000 secured by real property; Mehrdad Moayedi guaranteed the loan, limiting his guaranty liability to $196,000 plus interest and costs.
- The guaranty contained broad waiver language: Guarantor waived “any,” “each,” and “every” defense (paragraph 7) and agreed lender could enforce without exhausting collateral.
- After default, lender I‑35 purchased the property at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale as sole bidder; sale price $487,200; agreed fair market value was $840,000.
- Lender sought a deficiency judgment for $266,748.84; Moayedi asserted Property Code §51.003 and sought an offset because FMV exceeded the sale price.
- Trial court granted summary judgment for Moayedi; the court of appeals reversed, holding the guaranty’s general waiver encompassed the §51.003 offset. The Texas Supreme Court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Moayedi) | Defendant's Argument (I‑35) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether §51.003’s offset is a defense that can be waived | §51.003 is a statutory entitlement, not an ordinary defense; should not be characterized as waivable defense | §51.003 creates an available defense/offset that parties may contractually waive | The Court: §51.003 provides a statutory defense/offset and may be waived |
| Whether the guaranty’s general waiver ("any/each/every defense") effectively waived §51.003 | The waiver lacks the specificity required for an intelligent, knowing waiver of §51.003 (invokes Shumway) | The broad language unambiguously waives all defenses, including statutory ones; Moayedi is sophisticated | The Court: the broad waiver is clear and, read with the agreement, shows intent to waive all defenses, including §51.003 |
| Whether public policy or statute prevents waiver of §51.003 | Implied: §51.003 protects borrowers/guarantors and should not be waivable without clear language | No statutory prohibition on waiver; freedom of contract governs absent clear legislative bar | The Court: Parties may waive §51.003; Legislature did not prohibit waiver; waiver enforceable |
Key Cases Cited
- Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett, 164 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. 2005) (summary judgment standard when both parties move)
- City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, 22 S.W.3d 351 (Tex. 2000) (each party bears burden on cross-motions for summary judgment)
- Langever v. Miller, 76 S.W.2d 1025 (Tex. 1934) (historical treatment of deficiency judgments)
- Tarrant Sav. Ass’n v. Lucky Homes, Inc., 390 S.W.2d 473 (Tex. 1965) (deficiency based on note less trustee sale proceeds)
- Shumway v. Horizon Credit Corp., 801 S.W.2d 890 (Tex. 1991) (specificity required to waive notice-of-acceleration rights)
- Coker v. Coker, 650 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. 1983) (contract construction and interpretation principles)
