Medical City Dallas Hospital, Inc. and Columbia Hospital at Medical City Dallas Subsidiary, L.P. v. Ardell Williams
05-14-00664-CV
| Tex. App. | Apr 8, 2015Background
- Ardell Williams visited a relative at Medical City Dallas and allegedly slipped on a puddle of water exiting an elevator, suffering injuries.
- Williams sued Medical City Dallas Hospital, Inc. and Columbia Hospital at Medical City Dallas Subsidiary, L.P. (collectively, Hospitals) for negligence.
- Hospitals moved to dismiss under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 74.351, arguing the claim is a "health care liability claim" and Williams failed to serve the required expert report within 120 days.
- The trial court denied the Hospitals’ motion to dismiss; Hospitals appealed the interlocutory order.
- The Court of Appeals considered whether Williams’s premises-slip claim was subject to Chapter 74’s expert-report requirement.
- The court concluded the claim was not a health care liability claim because it was not directly or indirectly related to health care; it was a personal, non-derivative premises negligence claim occurring at a hospital.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Williams’s slip-and-fall negligence claim is a "health care liability claim" under § 74.001(a)(13) | Williams: Her claim is ordinary premises negligence, not tied to medical treatment or services | Hospitals: The alleged failure to keep premises safe is a "safety" claim within Chapter 74 and thus requires an expert report | Court: Not a health care liability claim; Chapter 74 does not apply |
Key Cases Cited
- DHS Mgmt. Serv., Inc. v. Castro, 435 S.W.3d 919 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014) (premises claims at hospitals require an indirect relationship to health care to fall under Chapter 74)
- Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Lawton, 442 S.W.3d 483 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013) (mere occurrence of injury at hospital insufficient to convert ordinary negligence into a health care liability claim)
Affirmed: the trial court’s denial of the Hospitals’ motion to dismiss; Williams awarded appellate costs.
