History
  • No items yet
midpage
McRae v. McRae
2012 Ohio 2463
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Divorce finalized March 24, 2009; Carolyn alleged Jimmy failed to exercise stock options as ordered.
  • Trial court found McRae in civil contempt and ordered him to purge by paying $9,750.48 to Carolyn.
  • McRae paid $6,642.09 prior to sentencing; $3,108.39 remained unpaid at sentencing.
  • Court imposed three weekend imprisonments as a purge penalty and notified remaining amount could purge.
  • McRae paid the remaining sums; the court vacated jail sanctions after purge; appellate review became moot.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the contempt appeal is moot after purge. McRae contends contempt and decree ambiguity; seeks review of the purge. McRae argues trial court abused discretion; but must be moot if purge completed. Appeal moot; contempt purge rendered appellate review unnecessary.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cramer v. Petrie, 70 Ohio St.3d 131 (1994) (contempt power to ensure justice; civil contempt allows purge)
  • Brown v. Executive 2000, Inc., 64 Ohio St.2d 250 (1980) (civil-contempt sanctions coercive; purge to avoid jail)
  • Pugh v. Pugh, 15 Ohio St.3d 136 (1984) (civil contempt to coerce compliance; purge required)
  • Denovchek v. Bd. of Trumbull Cty. Commrs., 36 Ohio St.3d 14 (1988) (criminal contempt distinctions; punitive vindication of authority)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McRae v. McRae
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 6, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 2463
Docket Number: C-110743
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.