History
  • No items yet
midpage
194 Cal. App. 4th 128
Cal. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • McGinness died intestate on October 1, 2004; McMackin lived with her, paid home expenses, and claimed a life estate promised for 17 years of care and companionship.
  • Estate proceedings for McGinness were opened February 25, 2008, with letters of administration issued April 14, 2008.
  • In January 2010, McMackin filed suit asserting, among other theories, a Marvin claim for a life estate in the home based on the decedent’s promise.
  • Frost and Ehrheart, as McGinness’s heirs, argued that the claim was barred by the one-year limitations period in §366.3.
  • Trial court granted preliminary injunction, concluding the Marvin claim could be enforced and that §366.3 did not apply as a claim under Probate Code §9000.
  • On appeal, the court held the Marvin claim is governed by §366.3 and also addressed whether equitable estoppel can preclude application of §366.3.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the life estate claim is a distribution claim under §366.3 McMackin argues it is not a distribution claim under §366.3 Frost and Ehrheart contend it is barred by §366.3 Yes; the claim falls within §366.3 as a distribution from the estate
Whether equitable estoppel precludes §366.3 from barring the untimely claim Equitable estoppel may bar the statute when misconduct induced forbearance §366.3(b) prohibits tolling except as specified; estoppel should not apply Equitable estoppel may preclude §366.3 in appropriate circumstances

Key Cases Cited

  • Estate of Ziegler, 187 Cal.App.4th 1357 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (applies §366.3 to a contract-to-make-a-will-like claim for distribution)
  • Stewart v. Seward, 148 Cal.App.4th 1513 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) (equitable estoppel can apply to enforce claims to distribution from estate)
  • Battuello v. Battuello, 64 Cal.App.4th 842 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) (distinguishes tolling from equitable estoppel; estoppel may preclude §366.2)
  • Bernard v. Foley, 39 Cal.4th 794 (Cal. 2006) (discusses distribution and life estate context in related discussions)
  • Ferraro v. Camarlinghi, 161 Cal.App.4th 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) (extends §366.3 reach to equitable estoppel contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mcmackin v. Ehrheart
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 8, 2011
Citations: 194 Cal. App. 4th 128; 122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 902; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 418; No. B224723
Docket Number: No. B224723
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
Log In
    Mcmackin v. Ehrheart, 194 Cal. App. 4th 128