McLeod v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-1239
| Fed. Cl. | Apr 27, 2017Background
- Petitioner Suzette McLeod filed a petition under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program alleging right shoulder/arm pain after a trivalent influenza vaccination administered at work on November 20, 2015.
- Petitioner alleged residual effects lasting more than six months and that no other party had filed suit or received compensation for the claimed injury.
- The matter was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
- Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) report conceding entitlement, stating the injury is consistent with a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) and was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine.
- Respondent also stated petitioner satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act.
- The Chief Special Master accepted respondent’s concession and ruled that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to compensation under the Vaccine Act based on alleged SIRVA | McLeod contended her right shoulder/arm pain was caused by the November 20, 2015 flu vaccine and she met statutory prerequisites for compensation | HHS conceded that the alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA, was caused-in-fact by the vaccine, and that statutory prerequisites were met | Court accepted respondent’s concession and found petitioner entitled to compensation |
| Procedural sufficiency of record for ruling on entitlement | Petitioner relied on her petition and supporting medical facts alleging causation and six-month residual effects | Respondent’s Rule 4(c) concession confirmed causation and sufficiency; no further dispute presented | Court ruled on entitlement without need for further litigation given the concession |
Key Cases Cited
- None (the unpublished ruling does not cite any reported judicial opinions).
