midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
386 S.W.3d 837
Mo. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Debbie and Monty McLallen appeal a summary judgment quieting title to eight acres north and west of Elk River in the Geigles.
  • Three deeds from 1984, 1998, and 2002 convey land described as lying North and West of Elk River, but do not specify which Elk River channel was the boundary.
  • Elk River consisted of two channels in 1984, with the southern channel carrying more water; in the 1990s the northern channel carried more water.
  • The 1984 deed to Judy Geigle describes the property lying north and west of Elk River, excluding a county road.
  • The 1998 deed from Geigles to Pittman and the 2002 deed to McLallen/McLallen spouses similarly describe land lying north and west of Elk River.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for the Geigles, ruling the 1998 deed was unambiguous and did not convey land south and east of Elk River; McLallens appealed claiming latent ambiguities require parol evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the deeds contain latent ambiguity. McLallen contends latent ambiguity exists due to two Elk River channels. Geigles contend the deeds are unambiguous on their face. Latent ambiguity exists; summary judgment reversed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Wolf v. Miravalle, 372 S.W.2d 28 (Mo. banc 1963) (latent ambiguity resolved by extrinsic evidence to identify intended tract)
  • Becker v. Workman, 530 S.W.2d 3 (Mo.App.1975) (latent ambiguity explained by extrinsic facts; parol evidence admissible)
  • Penrod v. Henry, 706 S.W.2d 537 (Mo.App.1986) (intent of parties determined by surrounding circumstances and conditions)
  • Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.P. v. Wilson, 965 S.W.2d 890 (Mo.App.1998) (ambiguous boundary requires considering surrounding circumstances)
  • Amusement Centers, Inc. v. City of Lake Ozark, 271 S.W.3d 18 (Mo.App.2008) (latent ambiguities require parol evidence; genuine issues of fact exist)
  • IT T Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-Amer. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371 (Mo. banc 1993) (defining standards for summary judgment and role of defense in movant's burden)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McLallen v. Tillman
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 16, 2012
Citations: 386 S.W.3d 837; 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1315; 2012 WL 4888315; No. SD 31659
Docket Number: No. SD 31659
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In