History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
400 U.S. App. D.C. 1
D.C. Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • McKesson alleges Iran expropriated its Pak Dairy equity and withheld dividends after the 1979 revolution.
  • District court proceedings spanned decades, with multiple remands on jurisdiction and liability issues under FSIA.
  • Tribunal Award in 1986 partially compensated McKesson for withheld dividends, paid under the Algiers Accords.
  • This Court has repeatedly held FSIA jurisdiction under the commercial activities exception but left open act of state questions.
  • The district court ultimately held treaty-based Iranian-law liability under the Treaty of Amity for expropriation and withheld dividends, awarding damages.
  • This court now resolves whether act of state, treaty-based Iranian-law liability, and damages scheme are correct and ends with remand for simple-interest-based damages calculation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does act of state apply to bar claim? McKesson Iran Act of state does not preclude.
Does Treaty of Amity provide a private right of action in U.S. courts? McKesson Iran Treaty provides action under Iranian law; suit may proceed in U.S. courts.
Does customary international law provide a private right of action here? McKesson Iran No private action under CIL via FSIA.
Is Iran liable for expropriation under Iranian law as interpreted by treaty? McKesson Iran Iran liable; attribution and come-to-the-company disputes resolved in McKesson's favor.
What is the proper form of interest for damages? McKesson Iran Compound interest reversed; simple interest remanded.

Key Cases Cited

  • Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964) (act of state doctrine framework)
  • First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio, 462 U.S. 611 (1983) (FSIA limitations on liability)
  • Sabbatino cited with respect to act of state principles, 376 U.S. 398 (1964) (principles of deference to sovereign acts)
  • Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004) (limits on private rights from customary international law)
  • McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 539 F.3d 485, 539 F.3d 485 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (treaty does not provide implied private action under U.S. law)
  • McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 271 F.3d 1101, 271 F.3d 1101 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (treatment of treaty and liability issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Feb 28, 2012
Citation: 400 U.S. App. D.C. 1
Docket Number: 10-7174
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.