midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
722 F.Supp.3d 1226
E.D. Okla.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Jeri and Robert McKenzie owned a home in Ardmore, Oklahoma, insured by Hanover Insurance Company, with coverage for property losses and specific policy exclusions for wear, tear, and faulty materials.
  • The McKenzies filed a claim for hail and wind damage following an April 2020 storm; Hanover's initial inspection (Ladder Now) and a subsequent engineering report (Day Engineering) found no hail damage to the roof, only age-related deterioration and damage below the policy deductible.
  • Plaintiffs obtained their own expert (Kaemmerling), who inspected the roof and opined there was significant hail damage warranting full replacement; Hanover disputed Kaemmerling’s qualifications and methods.
  • Plaintiffs brought suit for breach of contract and bad faith denial; both parties filed motions regarding expert exclusions, evidentiary limits, and summary judgment.
  • The court ruled on summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine, addressing both merits and admissibility of evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Exclusion of Plaintiff’s Expert Kaemmerling is qualified and reliable Kaemmerling unqualified and unreliable; disclosures lacking Denied exclusion; expert allowed
Breach of Contract Roof damaged by hail, covered by policy No hail damage; damage below deductible; exclusions apply Genuine issue of fact; summary judgment denied
Bad Faith (Claim Handling) Insufficient investigation, selective evidence; denial in bad faith Prompt, thorough investigation; legitimate disagreement in findings No evidence of bad faith; summary judgment granted
Exclusion of Defendant’s Expert Opinions not relevant after dismissal of bad faith claim Expert supports good faith in claim handling Exclusion granted; not relevant to breach of contract

Key Cases Cited

  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (summary judgment standard)
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (admissibility of expert testimony)
  • Christian v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 577 P.2d 899 (insurer’s duty of good faith)
  • McCorkle v. Great Atl. Ins. Co., 637 P.2d 583 (Oklahoma bad faith standard)
  • Digital Design Grp., Inc. v. Info. Builders, Inc., 24 P.3d 834 (breach of contract elements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McKenzie v. The Hanover Insurance Company
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Date Published: Mar 7, 2024
Citations: 722 F.Supp.3d 1226; 6:21-cv-00258
Docket Number: 6:21-cv-00258
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Okla.
Log In
    McKenzie v. The Hanover Insurance Company, 722 F.Supp.3d 1226