History
  • No items yet
midpage
2016 Ark. App. 337
Ark. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Kevin Louis McJoy pled guilty in May 2007 to two Class C felonies: possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver; he received five years’ probation with conditions.
  • A petition to revoke probation was filed in February 2011; warrants issued after failures to appear, and McJoy was arrested in August 2013 following multiple warrants.
  • In September 2013, after a revocation hearing, the court found probation violations and extended probation for two additional years on the original conditions.
  • Another revocation petition was filed in February 2014, and McJoy was arrested in June 2015; he entered a negotiated guilty plea to the petition in exchange for concurrent three-year sentences for the original drug convictions.
  • McJoy appealed the June 22, 2015 order entered after his guilty plea; appellate counsel filed an Anders brief asking to withdraw, and McJoy filed no pro se points for reversal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an appeal lies from an order entered pursuant to a guilty plea to a probation-revocation petition McJoy contends (implicitly via appeal) that the order should be reviewable State argues guilty pleas waive appellate review except in limited exceptions Appeal dismissed: guilty-plea rule bars appellate review absent an applicable exception
Whether this case falls within exceptions allowing appeal after a guilty plea (conditional plea, separate sentencing challenge, or evidentiary challenge) McJoy argues (implicitly) grounds warrant review State argues record shows no preserved exception to allow appeal Court found no applicable exception and therefore denied review
Whether counsel properly moved to withdraw under Anders v. California McJoy could argue counsel should remain if nonfrivolous issues exist Counsel asserts no meritorious grounds and followed Anders procedure Court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw after finding no meritorious issue

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967) (framework for counsel seeking withdrawal when appeal is frivolous)
  • Burgess v. State, 2016 Ark. 775 (Ark. 2016) (guilty plea generally precludes appellate review)
  • McCarty v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 404 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014) (pleas to revocation petitions are subject to nonappealability rule)
  • Cummins v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 657 (Ark. Ct. App. 2013) (same principle applied to revocation pleas)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McJoy v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Jun 22, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ark. App. 337; CR-15-795
Docket Number: CR-15-795
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.
Log In
    McJoy v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 337