History
  • No items yet
midpage
1:21-cv-00238
S.D. Ohio
Aug 7, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Philip R. McHugh sued Fifth Third Bancorp and related defendants alleging age discrimination, failure to promote, wrongful termination, and retaliation under federal and Ohio law.
  • RHR International, a non-party consulting firm in Chicago, conducted an executive assessment of Timothy Spence (but not McHugh) for Fifth Third Bank.
  • McHugh served two subpoenas on RHR seeking documents related to executive assessments for the President/CEO role at Fifth Third between 2016 and present.
  • Both subpoenas required RHR to produce documents by mail or email to plaintiff’s counsel in Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Upon RHR’s objection, McHugh moved to compel compliance in the Southern District of Ohio; RHR argued this was the wrong district because it is headquartered in Chicago (more than 100 miles from Cincinnati).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Place of compliance under Rule 45 for document subpoenas 100-mile rule doesn't apply to electronic production; subpoenas specify Cincinnati as place of compliance Rule 45(c) requires compliance within 100 miles of non-party's location; Chicago is the correct district The place of compliance is Chicago (RHR’s location), not Cincinnati
Proper district for a motion to compel under Rule 45 Southern District of Ohio is appropriate since action is pending there and subpoenas name Cincinnati Proper venue is the district where compliance is required (Northern District of Illinois), not where action is pending Motion to compel must be filed in Chicago’s federal court, so the Ohio court lacks authority
Relevance of documents sought from RHR Assessment documents regarding Spence are relevant to the discrimination lawsuit Blanket objections; production improper due to subpoena procedural flaws Court did not reach the merits due to procedural ruling
Effect of providing for electronic production on Rule 45's mileage limitation Electronic production avoids personal presence, so 100-mile rule not relevant Rule applies regardless of physical or electronic production 100-mile limitation applies; RHR need only comply in its home district

Key Cases Cited

  • None with official reporter citations
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McHugh v. Fifth Third Bancorp
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Date Published: Aug 7, 2024
Citation: 1:21-cv-00238
Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00238
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Ohio
Log In