History
  • No items yet
midpage
McGrath v. McClelland
2012 Ohio 157
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • McGrath filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition seeking to compel a criminal-sentence vacatur due to alleged improper postrelease control.
  • Relief also requested a final, appealable Crim.R. 32(C) order, return of garnished funds used to pay court costs, and prohibition on further garnishments.
  • Respondents (Judge McClelland and Clerk) filed a joint motion for summary judgment, which the court granted.
  • Court held res judicata bars relitigation of these issues because they were or could have been raised in two prior actions (Matia and Gallagher cases).
  • The court also held that claims about court costs and garnishment are not properly cognizable in an extraordinary writ and noted McGrath’s vexatious-litigant status under Loc.App.R. 23; costs awarded to McGrath.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether res judicata bars the writ claims. McGrath McClelland/Clerk Yes; res judicata bars the claims.
Whether the garnishment/collection of court costs can be addressed in an extraordinary writ. McGrath McClelland/Clerk No; remedy at law via direct appeal; writ denied.
Whether McGrath should be declared a vexatious litigator. McGrath Court Yes; McGrath is vexatious under Loc.App.R. 23.
Whether to grant the mandamus/prohibition relief and how to dispose of costs. McGrath Court Writ denied; costs to McGrath.

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Sneed v. Anderson, 114 Ohio St.3d 11 (Ohio 2007) (res judicata bars extraordinary writs when claims could have been raised earlier)
  • State ex rel. Mora v. Wilkinson, 105 Ohio St.3d 272 (Ohio 2005) (res judicata applies to relitigation of claims)
  • State ex rel. Whittengerger v. Clarke, 89 Ohio St.3d 207 (Ohio 2000) (adequate remedy at law via direct appeal)
  • State ex rel. Recker v. Putnam Cty. Clerk of Courts, 87 Ohio St.3d 235 (Ohio 1999) (adequate remedy at law via direct appeal)
  • Hutton v. McMonagle, 2001 WL 664139 (Ohio 2001) (frivolous conduct considerations in extraordinary writs)
  • State ex rel. McGrath v. Matia, 8th Dist. No. 94147, 2010-Ohio-1987 (Ohio 2010) (reiteration of res judicata and writ standards in district court)
  • State ex rel. McGrath v. Gallagher, 127 Ohio St.3d 1483, 2010-Ohio-637 (Ohio 2010) (res judicata dismissal of writ claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McGrath v. McClelland
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 13, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 157
Docket Number: 97209
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.