History
  • No items yet
midpage
840 N.W.2d 573
Neb. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Del McDonald and Coleen Spencer (formerly McDonald) divorced in 2009; they have two children.
  • The original divorce awarded Coleen sole legal and physical custody with Del having parenting time and a right of first refusal for overnight work periods.
  • Del later sought custody modification and an increase in child support after obtaining full-time employment as a respiratory therapist; the State intervened to modify support.
  • The district court increased Del’s child support from $69 to $982 per month, retroactive to March 2011, and allotted Coleen health insurance and tax exemptions accordingly.
  • The district court also ordered Del to pay a portion of Coleen’s attorney fees and refused to modify custody.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Custody modification standard Del argues material change in circumstances Coleen argues no material change No abuse; no material change found
Modification of child support Del claims improper calculation and worksheet use Coleen argues proper calculation under guidelines Court did not abuse discretion; support modified
Retroactive child support Del contends retroactivity is inequitable Retroactivity appropriate to prevent delay benefits to nonpayor Retroactive award proper
Tax dependency exemption Del argues exemption tied to current support status Exemption allocation within court’s equitable powers Court permissible to require current support for exemption
Attorney fees Del challenges fee award as excessive Coleen contends fees reasonable given services and equities No abuse; $2,000 attorney fees affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Adams v. Adams, 13 Neb. App. 276 (Neb. App. 2005) (material change standard for custody modification)
  • Pool v. Pool, 9 Neb. App. 453 (Neb. App. 2000) (joint custody work sheet when joint physical custody exists)
  • Hajenga v. Hajenga, 257 Neb. 841 (Neb. 1999) (guidelines-based child support with flexibility)
  • Emery v. Moffett, 269 Neb. 867 (Neb. 2005) (retroactive modification of child support timing)
  • State ex rel. Pathammavong v. Pathammavong, 268 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2004) (allocation of tax exemptions as an equitable matter)
  • Pursley v. Pursley, 261 Neb. 478 (Neb. 2001) (timing and fairness considerations in support orders)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McDonald v. McDonald
Court Name: Nebraska Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 10, 2013
Citations: 840 N.W.2d 573; 21 Neb. App. 535; A-12-1058
Docket Number: A-12-1058
Court Abbreviation: Neb. Ct. App.
Log In
    McDonald v. McDonald, 840 N.W.2d 573