History
  • No items yet
midpage
McCoy v. Fleetwood Aluminum Products CA4/1
D084305
Cal. Ct. App.
Jul 31, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Mark McCoy, a former executive, director, and shareholder of Fleetwood Aluminum Products, sued to access certain company documents under his rights as a director and shareholder.
  • McCoy had signed an employment arbitration agreement in 2018 when employed by Fleetwood, covering disputes related to employment, but also containing a “delegation clause” about who decides arbitrability of disputes.
  • After his removal as director and CEO, McCoy filed several lawsuits; the present case centers on document access under California Corporations Code, not direct employment issues.
  • Fleetwood moved to compel arbitration; the trial court denied the motion, holding McCoy’s claims as a director/shareholder were not covered by the employment-related arbitration agreement.
  • Fleetwood appealed, arguing that the agreement delegated the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator, not the court.
  • The appellate court’s review focused on contract interpretation and whether the language constituted a clear and unmistakable delegation to the arbitrator on threshold issues.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Who decides if the dispute must be arbitrated? Court should decide; claims not tied to employment, so not covered Arbitrator should decide; delegation clause covers questions of arbitrability Arbitrator decides threshold arbitrability questions
Scope of arbitration agreement Only employment/termination-related disputes are arbitrable Agreement covers interpretation/enforceability, not just employment claims Arbitrator decides whether claims are covered by the agreement
Injunctive relief exception Seeking document access is akin to injunctive relief, thus excluded Arbitration clause isn't limited by this; arbitrator still decides scope Arbitrator decides if injunctive relief exception applies
Waiver of right to compel arbitration Delay in moving to compel = waiver Delay unrelated to litigation; arbitration favored under FAA Arbitrator decides if Fleetwood’s delay constitutes waiver

Key Cases Cited

  • Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. 63 (2019) (courts must enforce delegation clauses and cannot decide arbitrability if clear delegation exists)
  • Spear v. California State Auto. Assn., 2 Cal.4th 1035 (Cal. 1992) (arbitration rights, like other contractual rights, may be waived by failure to timely assert)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McCoy v. Fleetwood Aluminum Products CA4/1
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jul 31, 2025
Citation: D084305
Docket Number: D084305
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.