McCoy v. Fleetwood Aluminum Products CA4/1
D084305
Cal. Ct. App.Jul 31, 2025Background
- Mark McCoy, a former executive, director, and shareholder of Fleetwood Aluminum Products, sued to access certain company documents under his rights as a director and shareholder.
- McCoy had signed an employment arbitration agreement in 2018 when employed by Fleetwood, covering disputes related to employment, but also containing a “delegation clause” about who decides arbitrability of disputes.
- After his removal as director and CEO, McCoy filed several lawsuits; the present case centers on document access under California Corporations Code, not direct employment issues.
- Fleetwood moved to compel arbitration; the trial court denied the motion, holding McCoy’s claims as a director/shareholder were not covered by the employment-related arbitration agreement.
- Fleetwood appealed, arguing that the agreement delegated the question of arbitrability to the arbitrator, not the court.
- The appellate court’s review focused on contract interpretation and whether the language constituted a clear and unmistakable delegation to the arbitrator on threshold issues.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who decides if the dispute must be arbitrated? | Court should decide; claims not tied to employment, so not covered | Arbitrator should decide; delegation clause covers questions of arbitrability | Arbitrator decides threshold arbitrability questions |
| Scope of arbitration agreement | Only employment/termination-related disputes are arbitrable | Agreement covers interpretation/enforceability, not just employment claims | Arbitrator decides whether claims are covered by the agreement |
| Injunctive relief exception | Seeking document access is akin to injunctive relief, thus excluded | Arbitration clause isn't limited by this; arbitrator still decides scope | Arbitrator decides if injunctive relief exception applies |
| Waiver of right to compel arbitration | Delay in moving to compel = waiver | Delay unrelated to litigation; arbitration favored under FAA | Arbitrator decides if Fleetwood’s delay constitutes waiver |
Key Cases Cited
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. 63 (2019) (courts must enforce delegation clauses and cannot decide arbitrability if clear delegation exists)
- Spear v. California State Auto. Assn., 2 Cal.4th 1035 (Cal. 1992) (arbitration rights, like other contractual rights, may be waived by failure to timely assert)
