History
  • No items yet
midpage
McConaghy, D. v. The Bank of New York
192 A.3d 1171
Pa. Super. Ct.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Dana McConaghy and her husband (Decedent) purchased a home; both signed an initial First Franklin mortgage that encumbered the property.
  • Decedent later, without McConaghy’s participation, obtained multiple loans and mortgages (IndyMac, then Countrywide), some using a forged document purporting to transfer McConaghy’s interest.
  • Countrywide paid off the First Franklin mortgage in 2006 (removing a $336,020.65 obligation that bound McConaghy) and acquired first-lien position; Countrywide’s mortgages were later assigned to The Bank of New York (BNY).
  • Decedent was indicted for fraud related to the Countrywide mortgages and died in 2008; McConaghy, who never signed the Countrywide loan documents, sought to quiet title asserting those mortgages were procured by fraud and thus void.
  • BNY counterclaimed seeking equitable relief: unjust enrichment, equitable subrogation, and an equitable lien for amounts it paid (including payoff of First Franklin). It also sought reimbursement for taxes and insurance it paid.
  • Trial court granted McConaghy quiet title (holding Countrywide mortgages void), denied BNY equitable relief based on unclean hands, and denied reimbursement for taxes/insurance. On appeal, the Superior Court affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

Issues

Issue McConaghy's Argument BNY's Argument Held
Whether BNY is entitled to equitable relief (unjust enrichment / equitable subrogation / equitable lien) Countrywide mortgages void; BNY cannot claim equitable remedies against her because mortgages procured by fraud BNY paid First Franklin and removed McConaghy’s obligation; equity should subrogate BNY to First Franklin’s rights and impose an equitable lien Court: McConaghy was unjustly enriched by payoff of First Franklin; BNY entitled to equitable lien; remand to determine amount (vacating unclean-hands bar)
Whether unclean hands bars BNY’s equitable remedies Countrywide’s conduct was fraudulent and thus bars equitable relief to its assignee Countrywide was deceived by Decedent and was not guilty of willful misconduct; unclean hands doctrine inapplicable Court: Unclean hands requires willful misconduct in the matter; Countrywide was not shown to have been fraudulent — unclean hands does not bar relief
Whether BNY is entitled to reimbursement for taxes and insurance it paid since 2006 McConaghy benefited from removal of First Franklin debt but did not live in property; taxes/insurance payments provided little benefit to her BNY sought reimbursement for taxes and insurance paid after taking assignment Court: Denied reimbursement for taxes and insurance — trial court did not abuse discretion given McConaghy’s limited benefit
Validity of Countrywide mortgages and quiet title claim Countrywide mortgages were procured by Decedent’s forgery and are void as to McConaghy BNY contested invalidity but asserted equitable remedies Court: Affirmed trial court — Countrywide mortgages void, quiet title for McConaghy granted

Key Cases Cited

  • Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Grp., Inc., 165 A.3d 908 (Pa. Super. 2017) (elements and framework for unjust enrichment)
  • Infante v. Bank of America, N.A., 130 A.3d 773 (Pa. Super. 2015) (equitable subrogation and equitable lien when assignee pays off prior mortgage binding on owner)
  • Shaffer v. O’Toole, 964 A.2d 420 (Pa. Super. 2009) (appellate standard of review for non-jury cases)
  • Shapiro v. Shapiro, 204 A.2d 266 (Pa. 1964) (unclean-hands doctrine confined to willful misconduct affecting the litigation issue)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McConaghy, D. v. The Bank of New York
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 29, 2018
Citation: 192 A.3d 1171
Docket Number: 1247 WDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.