History
  • No items yet
midpage
McClintock, Bradley Ray
2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1466
| Tex. Crim. App. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant McClintock challenged the search warrant for marijuana evidence as lacking probable cause.
  • Warrant affidavit included a drug-dog alert and odor detection from the inside stairwell to the upstairs residence.
  • Trial court denied suppression; one appellate panel later held Jardines tainted the dog-sniff information, leaving insufficient probable cause.
  • This Court granted discretionary review to address good-faith exception and the probable-cause issue after excluding tainted information.
  • The Court vacated the appellate judgment and remanded to consider the good-faith issue first, pending further analysis.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether good-faith exception applies to exclude tainted evidence State argues good-faith reliance on binding precedent McClintock argues exclusion applies due to tainted evidence Remand to decide good-faith issue first
Whether probable cause remains after excluding dog-sniff information State contends odor evidence plus other facts suffice McClintock contends ambiguity prevents probable cause Ambiguity means probable cause not clearly established; remand instructed

Key Cases Cited

  • Florida v. Jardines, 133 S.W.3d 1409 (2013) (dog-sniff information taints probable-cause analysis)
  • Davis v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2419 (2011) (reasonable reliance on precedent; exclusionary rule limitations)
  • Castillo v. State, 818 S.W.2d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (when tainted information purges, magistrate’s probable-cause assessment may fail)
  • United States v. Kolodziej, 712 F.2d 975 (5th Cir. 1983) (magistrate’s review not appropriate where affidavit tainted)
  • Jones v. State, 364 S.W.3d 854 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (deference to magistrate’s probable-cause assessment; context matters)
  • Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1987) (retroactivity of new constitutional rules; Griffith applies to direct-review context)
  • Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) ( Franks issue not before Court; limited to affidavit challenges)
  • State v. Gobert, 275 S.W.3d 888 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (remedies and appellate posture when reviewing trial rulings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McClintock, Bradley Ray
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 1, 2014
Citation: 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1466
Docket Number: PD-0925-13
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.