History
  • No items yet
midpage
McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16352
5th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • McClain et al. v. Lufkin Industries, Inc. is a Title VII class action alleging employment discrimination against Lufkin; decades of litigation yielded a multimillion-dollar judgment, back pay, and injunctive relief.
  • Plaintiffs were represented by Garrigan (Eastern District of Texas) and later by Goldstein Demchak; no Texas co-counsel were available or willing to join the case.
  • District court awarded over $7.7 million in fees and about $3.3 million in back pay; Goldstein Demchak (California firm) participated as co-counsel.
  • Court previously vacated and remanded the fee award; key issues include appropriate hourly rates (local vs. home district) for out-of-district counsel.
  • Fifth Circuit vacates the Goldstein Demchak fee award on remand, but affirms back pay; discusses Perdue v. Kenny A and law-of-the-case considerations.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the district court properly set attorney rates when out-of-district counsel were necessary McClain contends home-district rates start point Lufkin argues local rates should apply Remand for recalculation using Goldstein Demchak's home rates as starting point
Whether Perdue v. Kenny A requires parity between plaintiff and defense counsel fees Plaintiffs seek parity based on Perdue guidance No strict parity required by Perdue Remand not required to apply Perdue parity in this case (per majority)
Whether hours billed for unsuccessful claims should be excluded Hours on unsuccessful Title VII claims should be counted Unsuccessful claims' hours should be disallowed Remand to reassess hours consistent with overall reasonable fee

Key Cases Cited

  • Blum v. Stenson, 465 F.2d 886 (Supreme Court, 1984) (reasonableness of fees based on prevailing market rates in the community)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 1983) (lodestar method; reasonable fee and hours; avoid windfalls)
  • Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974) (starting point for fee awards; local community rates)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 8, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16352
Docket Number: 10-40036
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.