McCarty v. McCarty
2015 SD 59
| S.D. | 2015Background
- Divorce in July 2007; joint legal custody with Mother as primary physical custodian.
- After divorce, Mother remained in Box Elder; Father moved to Gillette, Wyoming.
- Children typically spent school year with Mother and summers with Father.
- June 2012: circuit court awarded Father primary physical custody; May 2013 motion seeking change filed by Mother.
- August 2013: court changed custody back to Mother, finding no substantial change needed due to a scheduled review hearing.
- Trial focused on Fuerstenberg factors; two major changes cited: dissolution of Father’s medical group and Stepmother’s stage 4 metastatic breast cancer.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether substantial change in circumstances was required to modify custody | McCarty argues a contested 2013 hearing required proof of substantial change | McCarty contends no substantial change was needed due to prior review scheduling | Court erred in not requiring substantial change; substantial change required |
| Whether returning custody to Mother was in the children’s best interests based on substantial change | Father asserts changes cited were not genuinely substantial or relevant | Mother asserts the changes affected stability and best interests favored return to Mother | Yes; returning custody to Mother was in the children’s best interests given substantial changes. |
Key Cases Cited
- Benson v. Loffelmacher, 824 N.W.2d 82 (2012 S.D. 75) (interim custody context requiring substantial change to modify)
- Roth v. Haag, 834 N.W.2d 340 (2013 S.D. 48) (best interests framework and Fuerstenberg factors guidance)
- Schieffer v. Schieffer, 826 N.W.2d 633 (2013 S.D. 11) (abuse of discretion standard; factors consideration)
- Fuerstenberg v. Fuerstenberg, 591 N.W.2d 798 (1999 S.D. 35) (separation of siblings and Fuerstenberg factors relevance)
- Kreps v. Kreps, 778 N.W.2d 843 (2010 S.D. 12) (balanced approach to Fuerstenberg factors; best interests)
- Beaulieu v. Birdsbill, 815 N.W.2d 569 (2012 S.D. 45) (flexible application of factors in custody decisions)
