History
  • No items yet
midpage
May Construction Co. v. Town Creek Construction & Development, LLC
2011 Ark. 281
| Ark. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • May Construction is the general contractor for Town Creek's Aspen Ridge project; contract total not to exceed $3.9 million.
  • Town Creek financed the project with a Chambers mortgage encumbering Phases I-II and a $150,000 CD; Phase III was not mortgaged.
  • Chambers filed a construction mortgage on July 20, 2005; May recorded a materialmen’s lien on September 26, 2006.
  • Arbitration awarded May $428,995.56 in 2007, but did not resolve lien entitlement or priority.
  • Town Creek deeded the property to Chambers and Chambers posted a lien bond to release the lien; Ohio Casualty issued a $800,000 bond.
  • Circuit court held that construction commenced after Chambers’s mortgage, first priority to Chambers, second to May; May appealed and Town Creek cross-appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Commencement and priority of the lien May contends commencement pre-dates mortgage under 18-44-110(a)(1). Town Creek/Chambers/Ohio argue commencement after mortgage and mortgage priority control. Construction commence date is objective, not subjective; reversal to determine proper commencement and priority.
Amount and validity of May's lien and reliance on evidence May asserts lien amount includes labor/materials; profits excluded; some costs lienable. Town Creek contends disputed costs are speculative and not tied to labor/materials; overruled. Circuit court did not clearly err; lien amount affirmed with adjustments as ruling.

Key Cases Cited

  • BB & B Constr. Co. v. F.D.I.C., 316 Ark. 663 (1994) (strict construction of lien statutes)
  • Dempsey v. McGowan, 291 Ark. 147 (1987) (materialmen’s lien does not precede a prior construction mortgage)
  • Mark’s Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Republic Mtg. Co., 242 Ark. 475 (1967) (commencement requires visible action indicating construction)
  • Clark v. Gen. Elec. Co., 243 Ark. 399 (1967) (distinguishes preparatory work from commencement)
  • Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. Walker, 270 Ark. 868 (Ark.App. 1980) (site activities as commencement criteria)
  • Nat’l Lumber Co. v. Advance Dev. Corp., 293 Ark. 1 (1987) (distinguishes site preparation from commencement of construction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: May Construction Co. v. Town Creek Construction & Development, LLC
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Jun 23, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ark. 281
Docket Number: No. 09-1238
Court Abbreviation: Ark.