Matthews v. State
301 Ga. 286
| Ga. | 2017Background
- On July 11, 2012, two-year-old Jadien Harvey died of blunt-force head trauma; four-year-old Ashton Capers sustained multiple injuries (perforated intestine, fractured tibia, spinal injury, genital injury) consistent with physical abuse.
- The children lived with their mother Ashley Harvey and appellant Kemra Matthews, who cared for the children when Ashley worked; witnesses observed Ashton vomiting repeatedly earlier that day and Matthews threatening to "beat" him.
- Ashton, while hospitalized and later at trial, told family members and trained interviewers without apparent coaching that Matthews hit him (stomach, bottom, back, genitalia) and hit Jadien; the forensic interviewer testified Ashton was not coached and demonstrated assaults with gestures.
- Medical examiner testified Jadien’s acute head injuries (including a skull fracture and optic nerve bleeding) were from blunt force and would have rendered him immediately unconscious.
- A Clayton County jury convicted Matthews of felony murder and multiple related counts; he was sentenced to life without parole plus concurrent terms. Matthews appealed, challenging sufficiency of the evidence and counsel’s failure to present a defense expert on forensic interviewing.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence to convict of felony murder and related counts | State: physical injuries, medical examiner’s cause of death, child’s out-of-court statements, and other physical evidence support convictions | Matthews: (argued on appeal) evidence insufficient to support convictions | Affirmed: viewing evidence in light most favorable to verdict, evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia |
| Ineffective assistance for not presenting defense expert witness on child forensic interviewing | Matthews: trial counsel was deficient for not calling an expert to rebut State experts and to show Ashton was coached | State: decision not to call an expert was reasonable trial strategy; counsel cross-examined and argued alternative theories | Affirmed: counsel’s choice was within reasonable professional judgment; appellant did not show deficient performance or prejudice |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
- Stewart v. State, 296 Ga. 448 (2015) (Georgia sufficiency review cited)
- Pruitt v. State, 282 Ga. 30 (ineffective assistance standard articulated)
- Wright v. State, 291 Ga. 869 (if one prong of Strickland test fails, court need not address the other)
- Eason v. State, 283 Ga. 116 (decision to present expert is typically trial strategy)
- Jones v. State, 296 Ga. 561 (burden on defendant to show counsel deficient)
