History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of the Adoption of Z.N.F.
2013 SD 97
| S.D. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • D.L.F. (Father) appeals waivers of his consent to a stepparent adoption of Z.N.F., and the adoption order itself.
  • Z.N.F. (born 2002) is the child of Father and M.M. (Mother); they divorced in Oregon, with Mother retaining sole custody and Father minimal supervised visitation.
  • Mother moved with Z.N.F. to Colorado in 2009 and then to Rapid City, SD, concealing whereabouts from Father; restraining orders existed against Father in Oregon but did not restrict contact with Z.N.F.
  • Father failed to pay court-ordered child support starting 2009, accumulating a substantial arrearage, while earning varying incomes (notably 2010–2011 in the low tens of thousands).
  • Mother and Stepfather petitioned in 2011 to waive Father's consent and terminate his rights, seeking adoption; the circuit court bifurcated the proceedings, first ruling on waiver, then on adoption.
  • Trial court found abandonment, continuous neglect, and willful failure to pay child support, leading to waiver of consent and ultimately termination of Father’s rights in favor of Stepfather.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there abandonment to waive consent under SDCL 25-6-4(2)? Father abandoned Z.N.F. through lack of contact and support. Mother's concealment impeded contact but does not excuse lack of effort. No clear error; abandonment supported.
Was there continuous neglect to waive consent under SDCL 25-6-4(3)? Father continuously neglected Z.N.F. since 2009. Mother's actions and circumstances were not dispositive of Father’s conduct. Not clearly erroneous; continuous neglect established.
Was there willful failure to pay child support to waive consent under SDCL 25-6-4(4)? Father willfully neglected to provide support despite ability to pay. Financial hardship and concealment excuses; no willful default. Not clearly erroneous; willful nonpayment established.
Did the court adequately consider the child’s best interests when waiving consent and approving adoption? Best interests should be considered at waiver stage. Court properly addressed best interests after waiver and again in adoption stage. Yes; the court’s bifurcated procedure complied with SDCL 25-6-4.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Guardianship of S.M.N., 2010 S.D. 31 (2010) (natural-parent rights engaged; abandonment and best interests framework)
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) (fundamental parental rights)
  • C.D.B., 2005 S.D. 115 (2005) (abandonment and best interests framework for adoption waivers)
  • T.E.L.S., 2007 S.D. 50 (2007) (standard for abandonment and parental rights termination)
  • In re Adoption of Sichmeller, 378 N.W.2d 872 (S.D. 1985) (factors for abandonment considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of the Adoption of Z.N.F.
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 18, 2013
Citation: 2013 SD 97
Docket Number: 26656
Court Abbreviation: S.D.