History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of Konigsberg
132 A.D.3d 250
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Grievance Committee moves to strike respondent for felony conviction; Konigsberg admitted to NY Bar in 1962 under name Paul Jay Konigsberg.
  • Respondent pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) on June 23, 2014 to conspiracy to falsify books/records, falsify tax returns, and to obstruct IRS; plea included $4.4 million forfeiture.
  • Respondent notified Court of conviction and submitted an application to resign as a New York attorney.
  • Judiciary Law §90(4)(a) automatically disbars upon a felony conviction; §90(4)(e) defines felony inclusion, including federally classified felonies essentially similar to NY felonies (Margiotta principle).
  • Court may consider plea allocution to determine essential similarity; respondent admitted altering client trading statements and using amended statements to file tax returns.
  • Conviction deemed essentially similar to NY felony of offering a false instrument for filing; automatic disbarment as of June 23, 2014; motion to strike granted; resignation denied as academic.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the federal felony is essentially similar to a NY felony Grievance Committee Konigsberg Yes; essentially similar, triggering automatic disbarment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Matter of Margiotta, 60 NY2d 147 ((1964)) (defines essential similarity for federal felonies to NY felonies)
  • Matter of Goldner, 70 AD3d 236 ((2010)) (illustrates application of false-instrument concept)
  • Matter of Woghin, 64 AD3d 5 ((2009)) (permits consideration of plea allocution in similarity analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of Konigsberg
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 23, 2015
Citation: 132 A.D.3d 250
Docket Number: 2014-06085
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.