Matter of Konigsberg
132 A.D.3d 250
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2015Background
- Grievance Committee moves to strike respondent for felony conviction; Konigsberg admitted to NY Bar in 1962 under name Paul Jay Konigsberg.
- Respondent pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.) on June 23, 2014 to conspiracy to falsify books/records, falsify tax returns, and to obstruct IRS; plea included $4.4 million forfeiture.
- Respondent notified Court of conviction and submitted an application to resign as a New York attorney.
- Judiciary Law §90(4)(a) automatically disbars upon a felony conviction; §90(4)(e) defines felony inclusion, including federally classified felonies essentially similar to NY felonies (Margiotta principle).
- Court may consider plea allocution to determine essential similarity; respondent admitted altering client trading statements and using amended statements to file tax returns.
- Conviction deemed essentially similar to NY felony of offering a false instrument for filing; automatic disbarment as of June 23, 2014; motion to strike granted; resignation denied as academic.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the federal felony is essentially similar to a NY felony | Grievance Committee | Konigsberg | Yes; essentially similar, triggering automatic disbarment. |
Key Cases Cited
- Matter of Margiotta, 60 NY2d 147 ((1964)) (defines essential similarity for federal felonies to NY felonies)
- Matter of Goldner, 70 AD3d 236 ((2010)) (illustrates application of false-instrument concept)
- Matter of Woghin, 64 AD3d 5 ((2009)) (permits consideration of plea allocution in similarity analysis)
