History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matter of J.G.
2013 ND 26
| N.D. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • J.S.L.F. is a minor born in 2008 to B.F. and S.M.L.
  • Grand Forks County Social Services repeatedly investigated the child’s safety and welfare due to neglect and maltreatment between 2008–2010.
  • Mother moved with child to various locations; father largely absent and only minimally involved after 2009.
  • On Nov 15, 2010 the mother consented to guardianship by G.S., G.J., and K.C.; temporary guardianship followed when she took the child back with police aid.
  • Ex parte temporary guardianship was entered Nov 18, 2010 without notice to father and without a hearing on the guardianship petition.
  • District court ultimately appointed G.S., G.J., and K.C. as permanent guardians in 2011, finding parental rights suspended by circumstances; father appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether parental rights were suspended by circumstances to justify guardianship B.F. argues rights were not suspended by circumstances guardians argue rights were suspended by circumstances to protect the child No; rights were not suspended by circumstances; guardianship reversed.
Whether guardianship under 30.1-27-04 improperly tests parent's fitness B.F. contends 30.1-27-04 was misused to bypass juvenile procedures guardians argue statute allows guardianship when rights are suspended by circumstances Proceedings under 30.1-27 are inappropriate for testing parental fitness.
Whether abandonment supported suspension or termination of parental rights B.F. contends no abandonment; maintained contact and support guardians relied on alleged abandonment to justify guardianship Record does not support abandonment; no suspension by abandonment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hamers v. Guttormson, 2000 ND 93 (ND) (parental custody priorities but not absolute; exceptional circumstances may favor third-party custody)
  • In re Adoption of S.R.F., 2004 ND 150 (ND) (factors for abandonment and parental duties relevant to guardianship/adoption)
  • In re A.M.W., 2010 ND 154 (ND) (factors for abandonment and parental intent in custody matters)
  • In re A.M.M., 529 N.W.2d 864 (ND) (considerations of parental duties and abandonment in custody actions)
  • Guardianship of Copenhaver, 865 P.2d 979 (Idaho 1993) (defines suspension by circumstances as depriving parent of ability to assume duties)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matter of J.G.
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 26, 2013
Citation: 2013 ND 26
Docket Number: 20120199
Court Abbreviation: N.D.