History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley
2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Claimant sustained a compensable left knee/leg injury on Jan 18, 2007 with multiple surgeries; treating physician states additional surgeries are needed and that Claimant is not yet at MMI.
  • Temporary total disability benefits were paid for 104 weeks and then ceased by statute; impairment benefits began thereafter.
  • Claimant sought permanent total disability (PTD) benefits from Jan 18, 2009, arguing ongoing total disability; Employer/Carrier denied arguing PTD is not ripe until MMI.
  • JCC awarded PTD benefits based on present disability status, citing a supposed gap in benefits and treating disability as permanency.
  • Carriers appeal, arguing PTD cannot be awarded before MMI and Claimant failed to prove disability will exist after MMI.
  • Court en banc reverses, relying on Oswald and its progeny to hold no pre-MMI PTD award absent proof of continued disability after MMI.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether PTD can be awarded before reaching MMI. Hadley seeks PTD despite not yet at MMI. Oswald and statute preclude pre-MMI PTD absent post-MMI disability proof. Pre-MMI PTD not ripe; PTD denied.
Whether Oswald governs gap-coverage for PTD eligibility. Oswald should allow PTD to avoid a benefits gap. Statutes require MMI-based determination; no gap to fix. Oswald applies; PTD reversed.
Whether statutory scheme permits continuous disability benefits without MMI proof. Legislature intended prompt benefits despite ongoing improvement. Law creates gap; cannot award pre-MMI PTD. Not permitted; no pre-MMI PTD based on current status.

Key Cases Cited

  • Oswald v. City of Pensacola Firefighters, 710 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (establishes the pre-MMI PTD rule and the Oswald gap exception)
  • Crum v. Richmond, 46 So.3d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (PTD test pre-MMI: total disability at expiration of TTD and remains post-MMI)
  • East v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 51 So.3d 516 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (reaffirms pre-MMI PTD criteria under Oswald line)
  • Thompson v. Florida Industrial Comm'n, 224 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1969) (statutory limits for temporary benefits; legislative remedy needed for gaps)
  • Quintana v. Fla. Transp. 1982, Inc., 1 So.3d 388 (Fla.1st DCA 2009) (context on temporary vs permanent impairment considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 29, 2011
Citation: 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18955
Docket Number: 1D09-3360
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.