Mathes v. Lion
No. W08648.
| N.C. Indus. Comm. | Nov 2, 2010Background
- Plaintiff is 65, living in Rocky Point, NC, and had worked for Food Lion for 5 years as a meat cutter trainee.
- On February 6, 2009, around 8:15 p.m., Plaintiff slipped in the Wrightsboro Food Lion market freezer, falling and injuring his back and neck after striking his left hand and elbow.
- Plaintiff immediately reported the injury, went to the ER, and was treated for a lumbar injury and left hand contusion/abrasion.
- He subsequently received urgent care on February 11, and began treating with his primary care physician, Dr. Rafalowski, on February 24 with new, persistent back and neck pain.
- Dr. Rafalowski testified the back/neck pain post-accident became much worse and more constant, leading to referral for MRI and neurosurgical evaluation; ACDF surgery was performed August 19, 2009.
- Plaintiff has not worked since the accident; medical opinions support total disability and ongoing treatment, including consideration of a spinal cord stimulator.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is the February 6, 2009 injury a compensable work accident? | Plaintiff's injury arose from a workplace fall. | Defendant disputed or limited causation; need for medical nexus. | Yes, compensable under NC workers' compensation Act. |
| Is Plaintiff temporarily totally disabled due to the compensable injury? | Injury caused ongoing, disabling pain preventing work. | Disability must be supported by medical evidence; ongoing work capacity unclear. | Plaintiff remains temporarily totally disabled. |
| What is the appropriate disability wage and payment duration? | Entitled to TTD benefits at statutory rate until further order. | Benefits governed by statute and evidence of disability duration. | TTD awarded at $281.34 per week from Feb 6, 2009 onward. |
| What medical expenses and future treatments are covered? | Medical care related to the February 6, 2009 injury should be covered. | Coverage limited to reasonable, necessary care tied to the injury. | Plaintiff entitled to all medical expenses related to the compensable injury, including surgery. |
| Should pain management be evaluated and adjusted by Navy/IC Nurse? | Current regimen needs reassessment; pain management improvements warranted. | Non-specific; standard care should suffice. | Industrial Commission Nurse to evaluate and assist pain management regimen. |
Key Cases Cited
- Russell v. Lowes Prod. Distribution, 108 N.C. App. 762, 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993) (supports compensation and disability principles under the Act)
