History
  • No items yet
midpage
Matherne v. Barnum
94 So. 3d 782
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Mathernes contracted with Barnum and Barnum Construction, L.L.C. for bulkhead, boat slip with lift, and deck work for $39,000.
  • Work completed July 2006; adjacent home and walkway connected to the work were built afterward.
  • In 2007, sinkhole, cracks, bulkhead bulges, and a displaced support pole prompted complaints; Barnum attempted repairs but customers remained dissatisfied.
  • Engineering opinion in 2008 recommended demolition and full replacement of the bulkhead and slip due to instability and defectively constructed work, at a cost of $43,034.77.
  • Lawsuit filed March 27, 2009; bench trial October 7, 2010; court held Barnum personally liable, awarded several items of damages plus $25,000 for non-pecuniary damages and $10,000 in attorney’s fees, total $87,638.25; Barnum appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether prescription bars the claim Matherne argues contract actions have ten-year prescriptive period Barnum asserts tort-based prescriptive period of one year Claim timely under ten-year liberative prescription
Whether Barnum can be personally liable Barnum L.L.C. was a sham; veil pierced; Barnum liable for negligence Limited liability status shields personal liability Barnum personally liable under RS 12:1320(D) due to professional negligence
Admission of duplicate contract copy and contract existence Duplicate Barnum copy could prove contract with Barnum L.L.C. Duplicate is best evidence and should be admitted Trial court correct to exclude duplicate; oral contract established with Barnum and Barnum L.L.C.
Damages for non-pecuniary losses Non-pecuniary damages were proper for emotional distress related to defective work Non-pecuniary damages should be limited or disallowed Initial $25,000 reduced to $5,000 on appeal
Attorney’s fees Fees may be recoverable under contract or statute No contract or statute supports fee award Attorney’s fees award reversed

Key Cases Cited

  • Firmin, Inc. v. Denham Springs Floor Covering, Inc., 595 So.2d 1164 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991) (ten-year liberative prescription for contract actions)
  • Regions Bank v. Ark-La-Tex Water Gardens, L.L.C., 997 So.2d 734 (La.App.2d Cir.11/5/08) (limits personal liability of LLC members; exception for professional negligence)
  • City of Plaquemine v. North American Constructors, Inc., 832 So.2d 447 (La.App. 1st Cir.11/8/02) (contractor duty to perform work in workmanlike manner; damages framework)
  • Davidge v. H & H Const. Co., 432 So.2d 393 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983) (workmanlike performance and damages rules for construction contracts)
  • Guitreau v. Juneau, 479 So.2d 431 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985) (non-pecuniary damages in contract cases; Art. 1998 guidance)
  • Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993) (standard for reviewing factual findings)
  • Rayne v. Barrington, 575 So.2d 831 (La.App. 1st Cir.1990) (best evidence rule considerations for contracts)
  • Imperial Chemicals Ltd. v. PKB Scania (USA), Inc., 929 So.2d 84 (La.App. 1st Cir.2006) (trial court discretion in expert qualification and weight of expert testimony)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Matherne v. Barnum
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Mar 19, 2012
Citation: 94 So. 3d 782
Docket Number: No. 2011 CA 0827
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.