History
  • No items yet
midpage
515 F. App'x 334
5th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Interlocutory appeal from district court denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity.
  • District court denied Upshaw’s summary judgment due to perceived facts showing deliberate indifference to Walker’s Eighth Amendment rights.
  • Walker died after being killed by cellmate Hamilton at the Ferguson Unit; plaintiffs sued TDCJ, officials, and officers.
  • Upshaw, as Ferguson Unit warden, faced claims of failure to train/supervise and to implement adequate policies.
  • Court reverses, holding the district court erred in denying qualified immunity to Upshaw based on the record as a whole.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether denial of qualified immunity is immediately appealable Plaintiffs argue denial rests on fact disputes Upshaw argues standard is purely legal on appeal Yes; denial is appealable on legal questions under the standard.
Whether evidence shows deliberate indifference by Upshaw for failure to train/supervise Plaintiffs rely on expert to show training failure Upshaw asserts no deliberate indifference given lack of actual knowledge No deliberate indifference shown; record does not establish a policy-level fault.
Whether single-incident or pattern-based liability is required for failure to train Plaintiffs argue occasional lapse suffices under Canton framework Upshaw contends rare single-incident liability applies only in extreme scenarios Pattern-based proof generally needed; single-incident liability not met here.
Whether policy-based deliberate indifference can be shown without prior violations Plaintiffs rely on Upshaw’s role as policymaker Upshaw had no prior known violations or knowledge of danger Policy-based liability not established from the record.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thompson v. Upshur County, 245 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2001) (standard for qualified immunity and supervisory liability)
  • Estate of Davis ex rel. McCully v. City of North Richland Hills, 406 F.3d 375 (5th Cir. 2005) (deliberate indifference standard for failure to train/supervise)
  • Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1994) (duty to protect prisoners from violence; deliberate indifference test)
  • Connick v. Thompson, 131 S. Ct. 1350 (U.S. 2011) (single-incident liability; pattern requirement in municipal liability context)
  • Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1989) (possibility of single-incident liability in extreme training failure context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mary Walker v. Institutional Div of TDCJ
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 4, 2013
Citations: 515 F. App'x 334; 11-20628
Docket Number: 11-20628
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    Mary Walker v. Institutional Div of TDCJ, 515 F. App'x 334