History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martinez v. University of North Carolina
741 S.E.2d 330
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Martinez, plaintiff, was provost at Winston Salem State University (WSSU), a state campus under UNC.
  • In Aug 2008, Martinez agreed to resign provost and become full-time faculty under a written Settlement Agreement detailing salary terms.
  • The contract provided $180,000 administrative salary from Sept 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, then a faculty salary commensurate with peers at that time.
  • In May 2009, WSSU informed Martinez his faculty salary would be $85,000/year; Martinez challenged as not commensurate with comparable senior faculty.
  • Grievance procedures found the salary appropriate; appeals to provost and chancellor affirmed (Mar 2010).
  • Martinez filed suit May 17, 2011 for breach of contract and Wage and Hour Act; amended to breach of contract only Sept 14, 2011; defendant moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)/(2) and 12(b)(6); trial court granted Jan 18, 2012; appeal ensued.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sovereign immunity waiver and jurisdiction Waiver exists because contract with state agency allows suit for breach. State sovereign immunity prohibits suit absent express consent outside contract. Waiver found; dismissal under 12(b)(2) improper.
Exhaustion of administrative remedies Plaintiff exhausted grievance procedures before suit. No exhaustion or proper administrative path followed. Exhaustion proven; 12(b)(1) dismissal improper.
Breach of contract elements Existence of valid contract and breach by failure to pay commensurate salary. No breach shown within contract terms or scope. Complaint states a valid breach; 12(b)(6) dismissal improper.

Key Cases Cited

  • Data Gen. Corp. v. Cnty. of Durham, 143 N.C. App. 97 (2001) (personal jurisdiction standard for sovereign immunity motions)
  • Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303 (1976) (contractual waiver of sovereign immunity for post-filing contract claims)
  • Stahl-Rider, Inc. v. State, 48 N.C. App. 380 (1979) (state cannot be sued unless expressly consented)
  • Johnson v. Univ. of N.C., 202 N.C. App. 355 (2010) (de novo review for exhaustion of administrative remedies)
  • Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181 (1979) (12(b)(6) analysis: existence of contract and breach elements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Martinez v. University of North Carolina
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 20, 2012
Citation: 741 S.E.2d 330
Docket Number: No. COA12-396
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.