History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. PepsiAmericas, Inc.
17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 7
5th Cir.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Martin worked for Pepsi as a route settlement clerk for ~5 years, later promoted to a salaried route settlement supervisor with disputes over whether the salary covered all hours or a 40-hour week.
  • Upon leaving, Martin signed a severance agreement in which Pepsi provided a severance package in exchange for her release of claims; she did not obtain entitlement to certain benefits.
  • Martin sued in April 2007 for unpaid overtime under the FLSA and alleged fraudulent misrepresentation and Mississippi punitive damages; Pepsi sought dismissal and asserted a right to set-off the severance benefits against any FLSA damages.
  • The district court ruled Pepsi could set-off the severance value against potential FLSA damages but did not compare the set-off to the potential damages, and later dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction when the set-off exceeded potential overtime damages.
  • On appeal, the Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded, holding that the set-off was improper because severance benefits are not wage payments and cannot be used to offset FLSA wage claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether severance benefits may be set-off against an FLSA wage claim Martin argues set-off of severance benefits is improper against wages. Pepsi argues Singer allows set-off so long as wages are not reduced below minimum. Set-off of severance benefits against FLSA wages is improper.
Whether Singer and Gagnon permit set-offs in FLSA actions when benefits are not wage payments Martin relies on Singer's context to permit offsets. Pepsi contends Singer broadly allows offsets unless sub-minimum wages result. Gagnon clarifies Singer is narrow; offsets are disfavored when not wage-related; severance is not wage payment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Singer v. City of Waco, 324 F.3d 813 (5th Cir. 2003) (allowed a limited set-off where overpayments were pre-payments that did not reduce below minimum wage)
  • Heard v. Brennan, 491 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1974) (set-offs/counterclaims in FLSA wage cases disfavored; not a collection mechanism)
  • Gagnon v. United Technisource, Inc., 607 F.3d 1036 (5th Cir. 2010) (rejects broad Singer interpretation; offsets not allowed when not pre-paid wages)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. PepsiAmericas, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 28, 2010
Citation: 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 7
Docket Number: 09-60896
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.