History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin v. Martin
363 S.W.3d 221
Tex. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Dynasty Trust created for Courtney and Robin; Scott as trustee and MRMC director; MRMC stock largely funds the trust and MRMC is a major asset; Harris County derivative lawsuit filed by Scott in 2008 against MRMC; financing and credit deals were jeopardized, equity offering cancelled, and liquidity impacted; jury awards to beneficiaries included compensatory, mental anguish, and exemplary damages later reduced; court reversed and rendered take-nothing judgment determining damages evidence insufficient to support the verdicts.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Do nonwaivable fiduciary duties exist despite the exculpatory clause? Martin argues duties cannot be waived by the trust. Martin contends the exculpatory clause relieves duties. Yes; nonwaivable duties exist under statute.
Does Section R reach acts like filing a lawsuit, thereby triggering potential liability? Martin maintains Section R covers such acts. Martin argues Section R applies only to specific transactions. Section R broad, but duties still nonwaivable under statute.
Do the 2005 statutory changes (111.0035, 114.007) prohibit waiving fiduciary duties? Martin relies on waived duties under Grizzle being superseded. Martin argues waivers are permissible. Statutes prohibit waivers of nonwaivable duties.
Is the award for ‘other damages’ legally/factually sufficient? Courts allowed damages tied to corporate value loss. Damages tied to corporate losses not recoverable by beneficiaries. Evidence insufficient to support compensatory ‘other damages’.
Are mental anguish and exemplary damages recoverable given the evidence? Mental anguish showed substantial disruption; exemplary damages warranted. Evidence does not show high-degree mental anguish; exemplary damages depend on compensatory. Mental anguish damages insufficient; exemplary damages barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commerce Bank v. Grizzle, 96 S.W.3d 240 (Tex. 2002) (Trust Code waivers limited by statutory exceptions)
  • City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (no-evidence standards for legal sufficiency)
  • Parkway Co. v. Woodruff, 901 S.W.2d 434 (Tex. 1995) (mental anguish standards; evidence required for damages)
  • Guerra v. Service Corp. Int'l, 348 S.W.3d 221 (Tex. 2011) (reversal of mental anguish damages in cemetery case)
  • Murphy v. Campbell, 964 S.W.2d 265 (Tex. 1997) (stockholder damages rule; recovery limits)
  • Jochec v. Clayburne, 863 S.W.2d 516 (Tex.App.-Austin 1993) (strict construction of exculpatory provisions in trusts)
  • Lenape Res. Corp. v. Tenn. Gas Pipeline Co., 925 S.W.2d 565 (Tex. 1996) (contract interpretation; read whole instrument)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Martin v. Martin
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 24, 2012
Citation: 363 S.W.3d 221
Docket Number: 06-10-00005-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.