History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marsico Capital Management, LLC v. Denver Board of County Commissioners
2013 COA 90
Colo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • MCM challenges BAA’s upholding of BOE’s denial of protests to SNOVs for 2008–2009 from Denver City Assessor audit.
  • 2004–2005 tenant improvements expanded; improvements not initially taxed due to assessor system error.
  • Audit of 2005–2009 found neglected valuation of tenant improvements;重新valuation added to rolls and SNOVs issued.
  • City Assessor granted protests for 2005–2007 due to SOL; denied 2008–2009 protests.
  • MCM argues improvements were omitted property, not omitted value, affecting retroactive taxation; BAA rejected this reading.
  • ARL and statutory scheme permit retroactive assessment of omitted property under §§ 39-5-125, 39-10-101.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether tenant improvements are omitted property or omitted value MCM—omitted value; retroactive revaluation barred Board/Assessor—omitted property; retroactive assessment permitted Omitted property; retroactive assessment allowed
Authority of Assessor vs Treasurer to correct omissions MCM—only Treasurer may revalue omitted property Both may correct omissions under §§ 39-5-125, 39-10-101 Both authorized; not limited to one office
Effect of Northcutt on omission analysis Northcutt controls; information sufficiency implies inclusion Northcutt distinguished; omission possible even with information Northcutt not controlling; omission can occur and be retroactively taxed
Harmless error in BAA’s factual findings Errors require vacatur Errors harmless given record support Harmless error; affirmed on merits

Key Cases Cited

  • In Stitches, Inc. v. Denver County Bd. of Comm'rs, 62 P.3d 1080 (Colo.App.2002) (omitted property retroactive taxation allowed when entire class omitted)
  • Jet Black, LLC v. Routt Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 165 P.3d 744 (Colo.App.2006) (ARL-based omission and retroactive taxation)
  • Chew v. Bd. of Assessment Appeals, 673 P.2d 1028 (Colo.App.1983) (retroactive taxes on improvements after initial appraisal)
  • Northcutt v. Burton, 127 Colo. 145, 254 P.2d 1013 (Colo.1953) (omission analysis not solely based on information completeness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Marsico Capital Management, LLC v. Denver Board of County Commissioners
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 6, 2013
Citations: 2013 COA 90; 342 P.3d 462; 2013 Colo. App. LEXIS 868; 2013 WL 2449589; No. 12CA1266
Docket Number: No. 12CA1266
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    Marsico Capital Management, LLC v. Denver Board of County Commissioners, 2013 COA 90